2012年(464)
分类: Delphi
2012-05-29 15:15:54
Europeans have long relied on governments to set policies to protect their
privacy on the internet. America has taken a different tack, shunning detailed
prescriptions for how companies should handle people’s data online and letting
industries regulate themselves. But on February 22nd the Obama administration
signaled a shift in America’s position when it laid out a series of principles
that it hopes will be enshrined in a law, giving people more control over the
information being collected about them as they surf the web. But it is one thing
to bung the switch into browser, and quite another to get advertisers to comply
with the settings, as can be seen in the case of Apple's Safari browser and its
less-restrictive default setting that blocks third-party tracking using web
cookies.
The move comes at a time when web companies have increasingly come
under fire for the way they use consumers’ data. Last year America’s Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) castigated Google and Facebook after both firms were
found to have breached privacy commitments. More recently Google has been
accused of circumventing controls on Apple’s Safari web browser that are
designed to prevent firms from tracking people’s surfing habits. There has also
been an outcry over privacy breaches caused by some smartphone applications, or
“apps”.
In response to mounting pressure from privacy activists outraged by
these and other events, the Obama administration would like Congress to enact
what it calls a “privacy bill of rights”. Among the principles this would
enshrine are the control over what data is being collected, not collecting data
for one purpose and then using them in other contexts without permission and to
have personal information held securely. Companies' privacy policies would be
expected to reflect these principles.
Given this is an election year, there
is little chance that the Obama administration's proposals will be translated
into law any time soon. But the hope is that progress can be made nonetheless.
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration, an arm of
America’s Department of Commerce, has been asked to work with advocacy groups
and industry associations to produce voluntary “codes of conduct” that comply
with the principles in the proposed bill of rights. The FTC could then enforce
these codes.
The approach is not without risks. One is that lobbyists will
resist a strict implementation of the privacy principles as the details of the
codes are hammered out. Another is that some companies will simply refuse to
sign up to these voluntary regimes if they do not like the outcome of the
negotiations. Some manufacturers also
doubt that FTC will be able to sanction firms that breach the codes.