Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 534986
  • 博文数量: 154
  • 博客积分: 4055
  • 博客等级: 上校
  • 技术积分: 1381
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2006-04-01 14:26
文章分类

全部博文(154)

文章存档

2014年(2)

2013年(2)

2011年(2)

2010年(11)

2009年(9)

2008年(35)

2007年(22)

2006年(71)

我的朋友

分类: Oracle

2006-11-08 10:11:32

今天开发人员送来一个sql,说怎么跑都是很慢
我看了一下

SQL> L

  1  select COUNT(*)

  2    from leaguer l left outer join serv s on s.devcode = l.booktel and s.latnid = 434

  3*  where exists (select 1 from servunit su where su.servid = s.servid)

SQL> /

 

  COUNT(*)

----------

       779

 

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=4685 Card=1 Bytes=46

          )

 

   1    0   SORT (AGGREGATE)

   2    1     HASH JOIN (SEMI) (Cost=4685 Card=1259 Bytes=57914)

   3    2       HASH JOIN (OUTER) (Cost=6 Card=1259 Bytes=35252)

   4    3         TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'LEAGUER' (Cost=3 Card=1259 B

          ytes=2518)

 

   5    3         TABLE ACCESS (BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID) OF 'SERV' (Cost=

          2 Card=1 Bytes=26)

 

   6    5           INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IX_SERV_LATNID' (NON-UNIQUE

          ) (Cost=1 Card=1)

 

   7    2       TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'SERVUNIT' (Cost=4601 Card=6165

          125 Bytes=110972250)

 

 

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          0  recursive calls

          0  db block gets

     590947  consistent gets

      75486  physical reads

          0  redo size

        211  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        275  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

天哪,servunit全表扫描,这个可是900w的数据,发现索引也存在,后来重建一次吧,

SQL>

SQL> ALTER INDEX IX_SERVUNIT_SERVID REBUILD;

 

Index altered

SQL>

SQL> /

 

  COUNT(*)

----------

       779

 

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=4685 Card=1 Bytes=46

          )

 

   1    0   SORT (AGGREGATE)

   2    1     HASH JOIN (SEMI) (Cost=4685 Card=1259 Bytes=57914)

   3    2       HASH JOIN (OUTER) (Cost=6 Card=1259 Bytes=35252)

   4    3         TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'LEAGUER' (Cost=3 Card=1259 B

          ytes=2518)

 

   5    3         TABLE ACCESS (BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID) OF 'SERV' (Cost=

          2 Card=1 Bytes=26)

 

   6    5           INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IX_SERV_LATNID' (NON-UNIQUE

          ) (Cost=1 Card=1)

 

   7    2       TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'SERVUNIT' (Cost=4601 Card=6165

          125 Bytes=110972250)

 

 

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          0  recursive calls

          0  db block gets

     590947  consistent gets

      75486  physical reads

          0  redo size

        211  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        275  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

SQL>

为题依然存在,可能存在表的结构的问题,后来重新查询了标的结构,原来最后的s.servid是number,另一个是varchar2的,这时候索引会失效的,于是改了过来

10:01:17 SQL> l

  1  select count(*)

  2    from leaguer l, serv s

  3   where s.devcode = l.booktel

  4     and s.latnid = 434

  5*    and exists (select 1 from servunit su where su.servid = s.servid)

10:01:18 SQL> c /s.servid/s.id

  5*    and exists (select 1 from servunit su where su.servid = s.id)

10:01:48 SQL> l

  1  select count(*)

  2    from leaguer l, serv s

  3   where s.devcode = l.booktel

  4     and s.latnid = 434

  5*    and exists (select 1 from servunit su where su.servid = s.id)

10:01:50 SQL> /

 

  COUNT(*)

----------

       779

 

 

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=49)

   1    0   SORT (AGGREGATE)

   2    1     NESTED LOOPS (SEMI) (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=49)

   3    2       HASH JOIN (Cost=6 Card=1 Bytes=31)

   4    3         TABLE ACCESS (BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID) OF 'SERV' (Cost=

          2 Card=1 Bytes=29)

 

   5    4           INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IX_SERV_LATNID' (NON-UNIQUE

          ) (Cost=1 Card=1)

 

   6    3         TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'LEAGUER' (Cost=3 Card=4 Byte

          s=8)

 

   7    2       INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IX_SERVUNIT_SERVID' (NON-UNIQUE

          ) (Cost=1 Card=6165125 Bytes=110972250)

 

 

 

 

 

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          0  recursive calls

          0  db block gets

     517010  consistent gets

          0  physical reads

          0  redo size

        211  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        275  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

10:02:16 SQL>

ok,问题解决,效率马上提了上来,代价才为7,正好也修改了开发人员的sql,原来的sql查询也存在一些问题,呵呵

 
阅读(1182) | 评论(1) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~