No life is a mess of Chinese goods

No life is a mess of Chinese goods In the rapid development of trade liberalization and globalization today, no country will be able to buy the goods that people around the world. An interesting phenomenon is: the first part of the rich Chinese people, senior designer goods on foreign interest is growing, while the ordinary people in Europe, USA and Japan and other developed countries, but more willing to buy cheap Chinese goods In the past, only the rich can enjoy the luxury of developed countries, such as luxury yachts, limousines, Rolex watches, expensive jewelry, clothing and other international brands, and now some of the Chinese people can afford, but also a promising new businesses customer base. According to statistics, at present China to buy luxury goods of about $ 2 billion annually, accounting for 12 of total global sales, ranking third in the world after the United States and Japan. Some analysts pointed out that sales of luxury goods in China will rise sharply, by 2010, China's share of global luxury goods share of total sales will reach 20 Chinese toys, textiles, footwear, wood products so consumers by developed countries favorite. United States, Christian Science Monitor published No Made in China year, the article states: an American housewife want to attempt, insisted in a year not to buy Chinese goods, to see how life would be. She failed a result, after a year without Chinese goods days, she concluded: No life is a mess of Chinese goods. This is enough to prove that Chinese goods have been recognized by consumers in developed countries stands to reason that consumers buy cheap buy expensive whether to buy domestic products or to buy foreign goods, all their rights, no right to accuse others. Some countries or interest groups may be in their own interests, but desperately looking for an excuse to boycott Chinese goods, what Chinese shoes containing toxic substances; What car safety factor of Chinese non-compliance; what cheap Chinese goods disrupt the market, less than cost price dumping, should severe sanctions ...... some nitpick, some simply fabricated, malicious slander in Chinese export commodities, many belonging to the processing trade products are produced by a foreign or joint ventures, and took Most of the profits, but the charges are imposed on China head. This is really unfair. Some people accuse China exports only one-sided too much, but on the other side avoided, for example, Chinese exports to the developed countries to reduce the number of inflationary pressures? Bring much benefit to foreign consumers? Less developed countries consume so much energy and resources? American Newsweek International Edition editor recently pointed out in the past 10 years, China's consumer goods for the U.S. $ 600 billion savings. This data has been developed perhaps the most persuasive advocate free trade and fair trade, but when it comes to some of their own interests, it is the first violation of the spirit of the relevant provisions of the WTO and free trade, carrying out trade protection. In fact, the boycott of Chinese goods, not only hurt China, but also harm the interests of their people, to everyone's detriment. No life is a mess of Chinese goods is an obvious example.