So Why So Much Adversity Towards It When There Is Conclusive Proof That Something Of This Nature Exists
You made the initial statement, not me: I am responding to your question. You don even say what you actually mean by paranormal, other than it is not dead people. There is masses of stuff out there on the WWW. There is huge amounts of crap. There is huge amounts of science. Which bits are you referring to? I don know of any paranormal results that have been conclusively proved, and plenty that have been conclusively disproved. But then, if something currently called paranormal were proves, we would have to change our definition of normal to include it.
What have I said to show that my mind is closed? You haven given me anything to be open or closed minded about. You wont tell me what this paranormal is, let alone what the proof might be. You are presumably not referring to communications with the dead. So what are you referring to? Telepathy? Precognition? Telekinesis? Teleportation? Psychic healing (or harming)? Poltergeists?
Your sort has never brought anyone even one quark of genuine proof in such matters. What believers call "proof" is just quite immature subjective nonsense that means nothing to reputable scientists. You evidently do not comprehend science and logic. The first answer is much more correct than yours is. You are lying about skepticism. Overgeneralizations are illogical anyhow. There are many levels of skepticism, and the best ones show much nonsense for what it is. If you have any genuine proof, show it to several groups that will pay you a million dollars apiece for it, and you can be a millionaire. If you had any proof, you would use it to make some money, rather than just ranting here. Today, I am wearing a 1956 Jaeger LeCoultre "Memovox" alarm watch. A new one cost $14,500 last year, and a 55 year old one that runs well and is in great condition might sell for even mote at an auction. I have 1952, 1953 and 1956 LeCoultre watches. My oldest ones are an 1893 Patek Philippe and a 1902 Vacheron Constantin. If you win the James Randi Challenge, you can buy some watches similar to mine. Show us this "proof"!
sigh So much bravado, so little thought behind it. You've just trotted out Randi's Million Dollar Challenge as some sort of evidence that psi isn't real. Obviously you have no idea what science is. You didn't even know what the name of the million dollar challenge was.
Just as obvious is that you haven't taken the very first step in true skepticism, which is to look at objectively at both sides of the issue. No doubt = no skepticism.
So Mr. "Rational" Skeptic: Tell me what odds against chance Randi accepts for both the preliminary and main challenge. If you can't even do that, don't bother me anymore.
I think at least 10,000 times more than you can. Anyone who blindly believes Dean Radin does not think much at all. You are the one who does not comprehend science at all, and you have demonstrated that many times on AB. I just quoted some things James Randi wrote and you dare to accuse me of not knowing about his challenge or science. What a vile liar you are, just like religious fanatics. You do not know that there are several more such challenges around the world. You do not know what skepticism, science, etc. are. You have no basis for telling me about science. skepticism or anything else, when you do not comprehend them. It is sad to see such strong delusions rule anyone. I hunted ghosts since I was age 15, and I have never found even one. Some freinds and relatives told me about seeing them, and I checked on it. I often learened what was really seen, and it was never ghosts. I love to meet such people as you in person. They may be insulting on computers but meek in person. Not many men dare to insult giants to their faces. My "little brother" Kenichi is only 6' 5", 270 lbs., so he is a boy compared to me, and I lift him overhead with one hand. How big are you? I bet I can lift you with one hand and toss you into the nearest trash can where you belong. psi, in the 21st Century.
Many misconceptions about what paranormal means. It means not normal. Normal by human standards. Skeptics will say this does not mean it can be normal and they are correct but until an explanation is given it remains paranormal.
Your right Paranormal does not mean ghost, but some misguided people will make claims they are. Which harms those looking for answers.
So the question remains; What is this phenomenon that goes against logical explanation? Until it is proven to be normal it remains to be paranormal. And I am not sure they are not anything more than imagination. But I am skeptical not religiously convinced that it all made up.
But that "can you disprove it" argument is the worst you can come up with.
Can you disprove a little, 2in tall, green fairy was not standing on your head at exactly 12:34pm on July 4 of this year? I don think so. (Condescending attitude noted).
Can you disprove much of anything?
It logically impossible to disprove anything so it an argument that will only impress fools.
James Randi has $1,000,000 for you if you can show the "Conclusive Proof" you mention in this matter, and there are several more such prizes around the world. If there is so much "Conclusive Proof", why has not even one person shown it and won millions of dollars? I will bet you $1000, or more if you like, that you cannot show me even one item of even halfway decent proof in such matters. The general belief is that ghosts are dead people, so billions of people have said that. I just say, "Extraordinary claims require extraordianry proof". Show me even one item of it, and I will consider the possibility that you might be correct, and I will also pay you $1000. I will even bet the wristwatch I now wear. It is a 1956 Jaeger LeCoultre "Memovox" alarm watch. A similar new one cost $14,500 last year, and a 55 year old one that runs well and is in great condition is probably worth more than that.So Why So Much Adversity Towards It When There Is Conclusive Proof That Something Of This Nature Exists
You made the initial statement, not me: I am responding to your question. You don even say what you actually mean by paranormal, other than it is not dead people. There is masses of stuff out there on the WWW. There is huge amounts of crap. There is huge amounts of science. Which bits are you referring to? I don know of any paranormal results that have been conclusively proved, and plenty that have been conclusively disproved. But then, if something currently called paranormal were proves, we would have to change our definition of normal to include it.
What have I said to show that my mind is closed? You haven given me anything to be open or closed minded about. You wont tell me what this paranormal is, let alone what the proof might be. You are presumably not referring to communications with the dead. So what are you referring to? Telepathy? Precognition? Telekinesis? Teleportation? Psychic healing (or harming)? Poltergeists?
Your sort has never brought anyone even one quark of genuine proof in such matters. What believers call "proof" is just quite immature subjective nonsense that means nothing to reputable scientists. You evidently do not comprehend science and logic. The first answer is much more correct than yours is. You are lying about skepticism. Overgeneralizations are illogical anyhow. There are many levels of skepticism, and the best ones show much nonsense for what it is. If you have any genuine proof, show it to several groups that will pay you a million dollars apiece for it, and you can be a millionaire. If you had any proof, you would use it to make some money, rather than just ranting here. Today, I am wearing a 1956 Jaeger LeCoultre "Memovox" alarm watch. A new one cost $14,500 last year, and a 55 year old one that runs well and is in great condition might sell for even mote at an auction. I have 1952, 1953 and 1956 LeCoultre watches. My oldest ones are an 1893 Patek Philippe and a 1902 Vacheron Constantin. If you win the James Randi Challenge, you can buy some watches similar to mine. Show us this "proof"!
sigh So much bravado, so little thought behind it. You've just trotted out Randi's Million Dollar Challenge as some sort of evidence that psi isn't real. Obviously you have no idea what science is. You didn't even know what the name of the million dollar challenge was.
Just as obvious is that you haven't taken the very first step in true skepticism, which is to look at objectively at both sides of the issue. No doubt = no skepticism.
So Mr. "Rational" Skeptic: Tell me what odds against chance Randi accepts for both the preliminary and main challenge. If you can't even do that, don't bother me anymore.
I think at least 10,000 times more than you can. Anyone who blindly believes Dean Radin does not think much at all. You are the one who does not comprehend science at all, and you have demonstrated that many times on AB. I just quoted some things James Randi wrote and you dare to accuse me of not knowing about his challenge or science. What a vile liar you are, just like religious fanatics. You do not know that there are several more such challenges around the world. You do not know what skepticism, science, etc. are. You have no basis for telling me about science. skepticism or anything else, when you do not comprehend them. It is sad to see such strong delusions rule anyone. I hunted ghosts since I was age 15, and I have never found even one. Some freinds and relatives told me about seeing them, and I checked on it. I often learened what was really seen, and it was never ghosts. I love to meet such people as you in person. They may be insulting on computers but meek in person. Not many men dare to insult giants to their faces. My "little brother" Kenichi is only 6' 5", 270 lbs., so he is a boy compared to me, and I lift him overhead with one hand. How big are you? I bet I can lift you with one hand and toss you into the nearest trash can where you belong. psi, in the 21st Century.
Many misconceptions about what paranormal means. It means not normal. Normal by human standards. Skeptics will say this does not mean it can be normal and they are correct but until an explanation is given it remains paranormal.
Your right Paranormal does not mean ghost, but some misguided people will make claims they are. Which harms those looking for answers.
So the question remains; What is this phenomenon that goes against logical explanation? Until it is proven to be normal it remains to be paranormal. And I am not sure they are not anything more than imagination. But I am skeptical not religiously convinced that it all made up.
But that "can you disprove it" argument is the worst you can come up with.
Can you disprove a little, 2in tall, green fairy was not standing on your head at exactly 12:34pm on July 4 of this year? I don think so. (Condescending attitude noted).
Can you disprove much of anything?
It logically impossible to disprove anything so it an argument that will only impress fools.
James Randi has $1,000,000 for you if you can show the "Conclusive Proof" you mention in this matter, and there are several more such prizes around the world. If there is so much "Conclusive Proof", why has not even one person shown it and won millions of dollars? I will bet you $1000, or more if you like, that you cannot show me even one item of even halfway decent proof in such matters. The general belief is that ghosts are dead people, so billions of people have said that. I just say, "Extraordinary claims require extraordianry proof". Show me even one item of it, and I will consider the possibility that you might be correct, and I will also pay you $1000. I will even bet the wristwatch I now wear. It is a 1956 Jaeger LeCoultre "Memovox" alarm watch. A similar new one cost $14,500 last year, and a 55 year old one that runs well and is in great condition is probably worth more than that.So Why So Much Adversity Towards It When There Is Conclusive Proof That Something Of This Nature Exists
You made the initial statement, not me: I am responding to your question. You don even say what you actually mean by paranormal, other than it is not dead people. There is masses of stuff out there on the WWW. There is huge amounts of crap. There is huge amounts of science. Which bits are you referring to? I don know of any paranormal results that have been conclusively proved, and plenty that have been conclusively disproved. But then, if something currently called paranormal were proves, we would have to change our definition of normal to include it.
What have I said to show that my mind is closed? You haven given me anything to be open or closed minded about. You wont tell me what this paranormal is, let alone what the proof might be. You are presumably not referring to communications with the dead. So what are you referring to? Telepathy? Precognition? Telekinesis? Teleportation? Psychic healing (or harming)? Poltergeists?
Your sort has never brought anyone even one quark of genuine proof in such matters. What believers call "proof" is just quite immature subjective nonsense that means nothing to reputable scientists. You evidently do not comprehend science and logic. The first answer is much more correct than yours is. You are lying about skepticism. Overgeneralizations are illogical anyhow. There are many levels of skepticism, and the best ones show much nonsense for what it is. If you have any genuine proof, show it to several groups that will pay you a million dollars apiece for it, and you can be a millionaire. If you had any proof, you would use it to make some money, rather than just ranting here. Today, I am wearing a 1956 Jaeger LeCoultre "Memovox" alarm watch. A new one cost $14,500 last year, and a 55 year old one that runs well and is in great condition might sell for even mote at an auction. I have 1952, 1953 and 1956 LeCoultre watches. My oldest ones are an 1893 Patek Philippe and a 1902 Vacheron Constantin. If you win the James Randi Challenge, you can buy some watches similar to mine. Show us this "proof"!
sigh So much bravado, so little thought behind it. You've just trotted out Randi's Million Dollar Challenge as some sort of evidence that psi isn't real. Obviously you have no idea what science is. You didn't even know what the name of the million dollar challenge was.
Just as obvious is that you haven't taken the very first step in true skepticism, which is to look at objectively at both sides of the issue. No doubt = no skepticism.
So Mr. "Rational" Skeptic: Tell me what odds against chance Randi accepts for both the preliminary and main challenge. If you can't even do that, don't bother me anymore.
I think at least 10,000 times more than you can. Anyone who blindly believes Dean Radin does not think much at all. You are the one who does not comprehend science at all, and you have demonstrated that many times on AB. I just quoted some things James Randi wrote and you dare to accuse me of not knowing about his challenge or science. What a vile liar you are, just like religious fanatics. You do not know that there are several more such challenges around the world. You do not know what skepticism, science, etc. are. You have no basis for telling me about science. skepticism or anything else, when you do not comprehend them. It is sad to see such strong delusions rule anyone. I hunted ghosts since I was age 15, and I have never found even one. Some freinds and relatives told me about seeing them, and I checked on it. I often learened what was really seen, and it was never ghosts. I love to meet such people as you in person. They may be insulting on computers but meek in person. Not many men dare to insult giants to their faces. My "little brother" Kenichi is only 6' 5", 270 lbs., so he is a boy compared to me, and I lift him overhead with one hand. How big are you? I bet I can lift you with one hand and toss you into the nearest trash can where you belong. psi, in the 21st Century.
Many misconceptions about what paranormal means. It means not normal. Normal by human standards. Skeptics will say this does not mean it can be normal and they are correct but until an explanation is given it remains paranormal.
Your right Paranormal does not mean ghost, but some misguided people will make claims they are. Which harms those looking for answers.
So the question remains; What is this phenomenon that goes against logical explanation? Until it is proven to be normal it remains to be paranormal. And I am not sure they are not anything more than imagination. But I am skeptical not religiously convinced that it all made up.
But that "can you disprove it" argument is the worst you can come up with.
Can you disprove a little, 2in tall, green fairy was not standing on your head at exactly 12:34pm on July 4 of this year? I don think so. (Condescending attitude noted).
Can you disprove much of anything?
It logically impossible to disprove anything so it an argument that will only impress fools.
James Randi has $1,000,000 for you if you can show the "Conclusive Proof" you mention in this matter, and there are several more such prizes around the world. If there is so much "Conclusive Proof", why has not even one person shown it and won millions of dollars? I will bet you $1000, or more if you like, that you cannot show me even one item of even halfway decent proof in such matters. The general belief is that ghosts are dead people, so billions of people have said that. I just say, "Extraordinary claims require extraordianry proof". Show me even one item of it, and I will consider the possibility that you might be correct, and I will also pay you $1000. I will even bet the wristwatch I now wear. It is a 1956 Jaeger LeCoultre "Memovox" alarm watch. A similar new one cost $14,500 last year, and a 55 year old one that runs well and is in great condition is probably worth more than that.
阅读(231) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
