Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 115255
  • 博文数量: 136
  • 博客积分: 0
  • 博客等级: 民兵
  • 技术积分: 1504
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2013-05-18 18:08
文章分类

全部博文(136)

文章存档

2014年(120)

2013年(16)

我的朋友

分类: Mysql/postgreSQL

2014-05-09 15:10:03

This watch Snob is in.

A proper, Low-priced Watch

Let's not pretend about my profession. I just act on Coles. I am a team boss, Free of charge, But not very rich for a watch enthusiast. I was curious if you could bring you to ultimately place grace over a watch purchase. I are interested the iconic Seiko Black Monster. This appears stylish, Affordable and has a computerized movement that I insist upon. On top of that, The watch has to be willing to take a beating at work and keep running strong. I was just interested to see if you discover these watches to have any sort of ingenuity with design and enough of a classic nature to warrant a purchase. Well, What can you suggest I wear?

Can a watch called Black Monster looked into iconic? Unsure, But then maybe in the Coles managing circles, Icons are defined specially. Your criteria for a watch are set rather low, And there are worthier watches than this aptly named Seiko waste. Don misunderstand me, I do not have anything against Seiko, But I find few from the low end, Malaysian built watches pleasant.

If you willing to forgo your daily coffee on the internet, You could move into something you won be self-conscious to wear beyond the stock room. Take a see the Sinn 556, Which beats all of your criteria while still sticking to a modicum of horological dignity. Absolutely, It no Black enormous, But look beyond the walls of your working environment for a timepiece.

Is the fresh Rolex Better?

I was just wondering about your ideas on the two watches that were updated in 2011. Firstly, The Rolex ie II. Is the new movement better than the prior one? I know you don't favour the more expensive size watches, But do you think the 42 mm case improves its capability? The second one is the brand new Omega Speedmaster. Also a bigger case and a co axial flow. Does that defy the essence of living up to the fantastic trademark of it flying to the moon?

Rolex purists like to complain about the decline of the trademark sports watches since their heyday in the 1960s, Looking down their noses at such blasphemous movements as white gold marker surrounds and sapphire crystals. In this particular breath, People complain about the glacial pace of change with its watch designs and outdated bracelets and clasps. The particular, The brand has been continuing the transformative path that made them famous. The new calibre 3187 in the Explorer II is a fine phenomenon, With its improved durability and potential to deal with magnetism and temperature. The diamond and clasp have finally escaped the 1970s. Sorry to say, The larger case is an uncharacteristic step toward trendiness for the heretofore conventional brand. I would have really liked this watch if they kept it to 40 mm with the many other improvements.

In the western world Omega, I haven't drunk the co axial movement Kool Aid it's been serving. Whatever the functional improvement of a combined hours and minutes chronograph subdial, I find a two register Speedmaster beautifully wrong. These days there are so many iterations of Speedmasters that I lost track. Omega isn stupid enough to get rid of the classic Moon watch, But with all these new models, It's slowly applying water down the only true icon in it's entire lineup.

Main problem from a Watch Knob

I only desire to know what the cheapest Patek worth buying is. What I mean by this is that i'd rather not just buy the cheapest one so I can say I have a Patek. Which one would you say is the best of the Pateks that has a classic look with a leather strap and that I can buy without winning the lottery?

The words and should not be used in a sentence together, And not because there aren Patek Philippes that are viable. It is because should be available to the knockoff watches sold in Chinatown and for the morons who buy them. Or for individuals like you who fish for one of the finest names in horology available merely for a look and leather strap.

The truth is, Quality typically comes at a price a concept that seems to elude you. If you seeking a hand woven timepiece merely for the name on the dial or the strap it on, You may as well go for a fake since the elements that make a Patek a Patek will be lost on you anyway. Keep in mind, There are many Pateks you can own without winning the lottery. A simple Calatrava has become the most iconic watch in the brand lineup and easily attainable. Wow, And you be happy to know that it is provided with a genuine leather strap.Sinn designer wristdifferent pieces

This watch Snob is in.

A proper, Low-priced Watch

Let's not pretend about my profession. I just act on Coles. I am a team boss, Free of charge, But not very rich for a watch enthusiast. I was curious if you could bring you to ultimately place grace over a watch purchase. I are interested the iconic Seiko Black Monster. This appears stylish, Affordable and has a computerized movement that I insist upon. On top of that, The watch has to be willing to take a beating at work and keep running strong. I was just interested to see if you discover these watches to have any sort of ingenuity with design and enough of a classic nature to warrant a purchase. Well, What can you suggest I wear?

Can a watch called Black Monster looked into iconic? Unsure, But then maybe in the Coles managing circles, Icons are defined specially. Your criteria for a watch are set rather low, And there are worthier watches than this aptly named Seiko waste. Don misunderstand me, I do not have anything against Seiko, But I find few from the low end, Malaysian built watches pleasant.

If you willing to forgo your daily coffee on the internet, You could move into something you won be self-conscious to wear beyond the stock room. Take a see the Sinn 556, Which beats all of your criteria while still sticking to a modicum of horological dignity. Absolutely, It no Black enormous, But look beyond the walls of your working environment for a timepiece.

Is the fresh Rolex Better?

I was just wondering about your ideas on the two watches that were updated in 2011. Firstly, The Rolex ie II. Is the new movement better than the prior one? I know you don't favour the more expensive size watches, But do you think the 42 mm case improves its capability? The second one is the brand new Omega Speedmaster. Also a bigger case and a co axial flow. Does that defy the essence of living up to the fantastic trademark of it flying to the moon?

Rolex purists like to complain about the decline of the trademark sports watches since their heyday in the 1960s, Looking down their noses at such blasphemous movements as white gold marker surrounds and sapphire crystals. In this particular breath, People complain about the glacial pace of change with its watch designs and outdated bracelets and clasps. The particular, The brand has been continuing the transformative path that made them famous. The new calibre 3187 in the Explorer II is a fine phenomenon, With its improved durability and potential to deal with magnetism and temperature. The diamond and clasp have finally escaped the 1970s. Sorry to say, The larger case is an uncharacteristic step toward trendiness for the heretofore conventional brand. I would have really liked this watch if they kept it to 40 mm with the many other improvements.

In the western world Omega, I haven't drunk the co axial movement Kool Aid it's been serving. Whatever the functional improvement of a combined hours and minutes chronograph subdial, I find a two register Speedmaster beautifully wrong. These days there are so many iterations of Speedmasters that I lost track. Omega isn stupid enough to get rid of the classic Moon watch, But with all these new models, It's slowly applying water down the only true icon in it's entire lineup.

Main problem from a Watch Knob

I only desire to know what the cheapest Patek worth buying is. What I mean by this is that i'd rather not just buy the cheapest one so I can say I have a Patek. Which one would you say is the best of the Pateks that has a classic look with a leather strap and that I can buy without winning the lottery?

The words and should not be used in a sentence together, And not because there aren Patek Philippes that are viable. It is because should be available to the knockoff watches sold in Chinatown and for the morons who buy them. Or for individuals like you who fish for one of the finest names in horology available merely for a look and leather strap.

The truth is, Quality typically comes at a price a concept that seems to elude you. If you seeking a hand woven timepiece merely for the name on the dial or the strap it on, You may as well go for a fake since the elements that make a Patek a Patek will be lost on you anyway. Keep in mind, There are many Pateks you can own without winning the lottery. A simple Calatrava has become the most iconic watch in the brand lineup and easily attainable. Wow, And you be happy to know that it is provided with a genuine leather strap.Sinn designer wristdifferent pieces

This watch Snob is in.

A proper, Low-priced Watch

Let's not pretend about my profession. I just act on Coles. I am a team boss, Free of charge, But not very rich for a watch enthusiast. I was curious if you could bring you to ultimately place grace over a watch purchase. I are interested the iconic Seiko Black Monster. This appears stylish, Affordable and has a computerized movement that I insist upon. On top of that, The watch has to be willing to take a beating at work and keep running strong. I was just interested to see if you discover these watches to have any sort of ingenuity with design and enough of a classic nature to warrant a purchase. Well, What can you suggest I wear?

Can a watch called Black Monster looked into iconic? Unsure, But then maybe in the Coles managing circles, Icons are defined specially. Your criteria for a watch are set rather low, And there are worthier watches than this aptly named Seiko waste. Don misunderstand me, I do not have anything against Seiko, But I find few from the low end, Malaysian built watches pleasant.

If you willing to forgo your daily coffee on the internet, You could move into something you won be self-conscious to wear beyond the stock room. Take a see the Sinn 556, Which beats all of your criteria while still sticking to a modicum of horological dignity. Absolutely, It no Black enormous, But look beyond the walls of your working environment for a timepiece.

Is the fresh Rolex Better?

I was just wondering about your ideas on the two watches that were updated in 2011. Firstly, The Rolex ie II. Is the new movement better than the prior one? I know you don't favour the more expensive size watches, But do you think the 42 mm case improves its capability? The second one is the brand new Omega Speedmaster. Also a bigger case and a co axial flow. Does that defy the essence of living up to the fantastic trademark of it flying to the moon?

Rolex purists like to complain about the decline of the trademark sports watches since their heyday in the 1960s, Looking down their noses at such blasphemous movements as white gold marker surrounds and sapphire crystals. In this particular breath, People complain about the glacial pace of change with its watch designs and outdated bracelets and clasps. The particular, The brand has been continuing the transformative path that made them famous. The new calibre 3187 in the Explorer II is a fine phenomenon, With its improved durability and potential to deal with magnetism and temperature. The diamond and clasp have finally escaped the 1970s. Sorry to say, The larger case is an uncharacteristic step toward trendiness for the heretofore conventional brand. I would have really liked this watch if they kept it to 40 mm with the many other improvements.

In the western world Omega, I haven't drunk the co axial movement Kool Aid it's been serving. Whatever the functional improvement of a combined hours and minutes chronograph subdial, I find a two register Speedmaster beautifully wrong. These days there are so many iterations of Speedmasters that I lost track. Omega isn stupid enough to get rid of the classic Moon watch, But with all these new models, It's slowly applying water down the only true icon in it's entire lineup.

Main problem from a Watch Knob

I only desire to know what the cheapest Patek worth buying is. What I mean by this is that i'd rather not just buy the cheapest one so I can say I have a Patek. Which one would you say is the best of the Pateks that has a classic look with a leather strap and that I can buy without winning the lottery?

The words and should not be used in a sentence together, And not because there aren Patek Philippes that are viable. It is because should be available to the knockoff watches sold in Chinatown and for the morons who buy them. Or for individuals like you who fish for one of the finest names in horology available merely for a look and leather strap.

The truth is, Quality typically comes at a price a concept that seems to elude you. If you seeking a hand woven timepiece merely for the name on the dial or the strap it on, You may as well go for a fake since the elements that make a Patek a Patek will be lost on you anyway. Keep in mind, There are many Pateks you can own without winning the lottery. A simple Calatrava has become the most iconic watch in the brand lineup and easily attainable. Wow, And you be happy to know that it is provided with a genuine leather strap.
阅读(153) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~