Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 79645
  • 博文数量: 21
  • 博客积分: 0
  • 博客等级: 民兵
  • 技术积分: 200
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2014-07-03 22:41
文章分类
文章存档

2017年(8)

2014年(13)

我的朋友

分类: LINUX

2017-05-27 18:03:56

2.6.28版本起,内核代码的drivers下增加了一个staging目录,这个目录也是用来存放驱动程序,只是这里的驱动和上层目录的不同,加载的时候内核log会打印如下的语句:

MODULE_NAME: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned.

drivers/staging究竟所谓何物,需要从 staging tree说起。

于2008年6月10号在Linux内核邮件列表里发出,宣布建立了另外一棵kernel tree,这就是Linux staging tree。Greg解释到,staging tree建立之目的是用来放置一些未充分或者因为一些其他原因未能进入内核的新增驱动程序和新增文件系统。在信中,Greg罗列了开发者把代码提交到staging tree应该遵循哪些规则,以及哪些行为是在staging tree不受欢迎的:

The rules of what can be included here is as follows:
	- the code must be released under a Linux kernel-compatible
	  license
	- the goal of the developers must be to merge this code into the
	  main kernel tree in the near future, but not for the next
	  kernel release.
	- the code must build properly on the x86 platform
	- this is not a tree for bugfixes or rewrites of existing kernel
	  code, this should be for new features, drivers, and
	  filesystems.
	- the patches included must detail exactly what is needed to be
	  completed in order for them to be included into the main
	  kernel tree.
	- there must be some email address associated with the patch
	  that can be used for bug reporting and questions about
	  cleanups and testing the code.

What this tree is not:
	- it is not a place to dump features that are being actively
	  developed by a community of people (reiserfs4 for example.)
	- it is not a place to dump code and then run away, hoping that
	  someone else will do the cleanup work for you.  While there
	  are developers available to do this kind of work, you need to
	  get someone to agree to "babysit" the code.

但是,也有人对staging tree建立的必要性有些疑问的,毕竟,在此之前我们已经有了。Greg对这些疑问解释到,staging tree只是收留新增的驱动程序和文件系统,并不接收对已有代码的修改补丁。因此可以说,Greg的staging tree在很大程度上分担了身上的压力,但并不意味着linux-next tree的角色定位发生了变化。

到这里,我们似乎应该比较了然了,对于新增的驱动我们提交的对象就是staging tree。但Greg在2009年3月18号发表的带来了一些变故。

在文章中,Greg提到在数月前的Linux内核开发者的会议上,经过讨论Linux-staging tree的定位发生了变化,但还是很多人对staging tree究竟是什么有些疑惑。因此,Greg在这篇文章里重申了staging tree究竟是什么和不是什么(大概意思和上面引用的那封信里的内容类似)。并且,staging tree里的代码也已经被合并到了Linux内核代码里,位置正是本文开始提到的drivers/staging。也就是说,自2.6.28内核开始,我们如果要测试staging tree里的驱动程序或者文件系统,并不需要clone一个staging tree再合并到mainline内核里,mainline本身就已经包含了staging tree的代码了。对于Linux驱动开发者来说,我们也可以clone linux-next tree并以它为基础来提交驱动程序。

那这样是不是意味着Greg的linux staging tree已经没用了呢?我在提交驱动的时候也有这样的疑问,因此特意写信向Greg求证。Greg的回复说,如果我们要把新增的driver提交给他本人处理,还是可以继续基于linux staging tree来做patch;如果我们的工作不止是开发staging driver,比如还在为其他内核代码开发补丁,那么基于linux-next tree来制作patch也是可以的。

阅读(1673) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~