全部博文（28）
分类： IT职场
2009-02-07 10:10:47
What Would an Ideal Project Management Tool Look Like?
By
Experienced project managers know how inefficient traditional project management applications can be.
Let’s analyze the drawbacks of traditional tools and then picture how an ideal tool should be able to overcome the problems connected with them and make project managers more productive.
The need for transparency
Organization leaders often don’t have adequate visibility of their internal operations. This is due to misalignment of strategic plans, quarterly plans, project plans and daily to-do lists of team members. All of these elements should be a part of one master plan to provide a real-time view of what is going on in the organization. An ideal tool should be able to easily merge all these parts into a bigger picture. With the help of such a tool, daily to-do lists should emerge into project plans. Projects should lead to achieving strategic goals.
The ideal project management tool should let teams interact in the project management environment, turn their input into shared plans and allow them to update plans when necessary. The plans should be automatically merged into a bigger picture, and changes in the schedule should be immediately available to everyone on the team to see. This way, input from the bottom of the organizational tree can be effectively combined with the guidance and control from the top. Together, the top-down and bottom-up approaches to project management allow companies to become more agile and productive. Then the whole structure is transparent and can be traced from a quarterly goal to a daily task of a team member. This is the real-time visibility into a company that lets corporate executives lead their business in the right direction.
Getting rid of excessive routine jobs
Today, the project manager is the center of all project communications. It’s his or her duty to compile status updates through e-mails and meetings and put them together like pieces of a puzzle. Then the project manager must input the mix of change requests coming from stakeholders and outside business environments, then manually update the plans email the updates to team members, report the progress to the upper management and remind employees about due dates and overdue tasks. This painful process is then repeated on a daily basis, slowing down project managers and organizations.
The ideal tool should eliminate a big chunk of this routine. Here’s what the whole daily routine should look like. The tool e-mails people about due dates and overdue tasks, so there’s no need for the project manager to spend time and energy on that. When tasks are done, employees simply click on a link in the reminder e-mail to set tasks as complete. The information that the task is complete goes directly into the shared workspace, so there is no more need to gather status updates through meetings and e-mails, and there’s no need to copy this information from e-mails to project files. E-mail notifications keep people on the same page, so the project manager doesn’t need to send additional messages about the updates. Stakeholders have direct access to reports and schedules updated in the real-time, so there is no need for them to pull that information from the project manager. It’s on their fingertips 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, across the globe. So what’s left for the project manager? Guidance and leadership. They can stop doing the daily, routine tasks and focus on making the whole process more productive, effective and enjoyable for all participants.
E-mail integration
Another big problem of traditional project management tools is that information often bypasses them in e-mails. It’s counterproductive and boring to manually copy updates from e-mails to another software application. This is the reason people often skip this procedure, leaving the plans outdated. There’s little value in obsolete plans. So all the complex scheduling features of traditional project management software often become useless in reality, especially in multi-project and agile environments where the schedule evolves over time.
The ideal project management tool should bring e-mail communications into the collaborative project management environment automatically. E-mail integration is as important as the ability to let team members update project plans themselves. A big part of the manager’s routine tasks will then be taken away, leaving more time for leadership and strategic thinking.
Summary
Having examined all the constraints connected with the use of the traditional project management software, we are now able to draw a complete picture of an ideal project management tool.
An ideal project management tool unleashes the power of collaboration and lets employees contribute to the planning and tracking process. At the same time, it lets project managers control changes and keep track of the progress. The project manager guides the team’s work based on the most up-to-date information.
The ideal tool is simple, agile and inexpensive. It is used by the whole company from top managers to rank-and-file employees.
Most importantly, the ideal project management tool helps companies gain an important competitive advantage by being able to see though all the internal operations and react quickly to changes in the business environment. The adoption of such a tool will then be to everybody’s benefit.
Centralization is a key aspect of a good project management tool. As suggested in this article, keeping everyone on your team in constant collaboration will keep projects moving forward in an efficient manner.
Eric - recent user of PPM and found it to be a very configurable and effective tool. You can integrate MS Project schedules for tracking purposes. PPM will tell you, based on the project schedule status, your project health in financial, risk, tracking and change management terms.
We also used PPM as the principal system of record for IT Management of all our intake (projects as well as enhancements and production support requests). In that sense, it was a total information system that enabled us to take control over the broad work load of the division.
I now work with a company that uses Primavera and it isn’t as robust nor is the company utilizing the tool to its’ maximum potential. Would love to bring PPM in here as I could see big opportunities for improvement with that solution.
Take care -
Anyone out there using HP (was Mercury) PPM? I have heard good things about it, but am curious to hear real-world accounts of the tool’s strengths/weaknesses…