3. hstore的GiST索引
hstore的GiST索引实现和全文检索的tsvector的GiST索引的实现差不过，都是签名文件索引。
3.1 GiST索引项的存储
1)所有索引项都采用签名向量压缩
2)hstore中的所有键和所有值都进行哈希设置bit位得到一个签名向量
3)签名向量的大小为128bit
3.2 性能推论
1)索引尺寸比较小(因为签名向量的大小是固定的而且一般比原始数据小)
2)每次查询要扫描的索引页很多（20%~40%
的索引页）
3)每次键查询(?操作符)至少要recheck 1.6%(2/128)以上的数据行
每条记录包含的键值对越多,需要recheck的数据行越多
4)每次键值查询(@>操作符)至少要recheck 0.02%((2/128) * (2/128))以上的数据行
每条记录包含的键值对越多,需要recheck的数据行越多
假设每条记录平均包含10条键值对，需要recheck的数据行估算如下
键查询(?操作符)匹配：7.5%的数据行
-
testdb=# with recursive tx1(n,sign_bits) as
-
testdb-# (select 1 n,1.0 sign_bits
-
testdb(# union all
-
testdb(# select n+1, sign_bits + 1 - sign_bits/128 from tx1 where n<=10
-
testdb(# )
-
testdb-# select n,sign_bits,sign_bits/128 scan_probability from tx1 where n in(10);
-
n | sign_bits | scan_probability
-
----+------------------------+------------------------
-
10 | 9.65566251563533320389 | 0.07543486340340104066
-
(1 row)
由此可见对键查询(多个键的?&查询另当别论)，hstore的GiST索引的查询效率是比较低的。不过，从另外一个角度考虑，通常的应用场景下，不同的key值数本来就不会很多，就不是索引的用武之地。
键值查询(@>操作符)匹配：0.57%(0.57%=0.07543486340340104066*0.07543486340340104066)
但是这只是理论上的平均值，由于签名向量的冲突，个别查询的效率可能会很低。比如，如果大部分数据记录都包含某个key，而查询这个键值对的时候，碰巧它的值在签名向量中对应的bit位和这个很常用的key相同，那么大部分数据记录都要进行recheck。
3.3 相关代码
contrib/hstore/hstore_gist.c
-
/* bigint defines */
-
#define BITBYTE 8
-
#define SIGLENINT 4 /* >122 => key will toast, so very */
-
#define SIGLEN ( sizeof(int)*SIGLENINT )
-
#define SIGLENBIT (SIGLEN*BITBYTE)
-
-
typedef char BITVEC[SIGLEN];
-
typedef char *BITVECP;
-
-
...
-
Datum
-
ghstore_compress(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
-
{
-
GISTENTRY *entry = (GISTENTRY *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
-
GISTENTRY *retval = entry;
-
-
if (entry->leafkey)
-
{
-
GISTTYPE *res = (GISTTYPE *) palloc0(CALCGTSIZE(0));
-
HStore *val = DatumGetHStoreP(entry->key);
-
HEntry *hsent = ARRPTR(val);
-
char *ptr = STRPTR(val);
-
int count = HS_COUNT(val);
-
int i;
-
-
SET_VARSIZE(res, CALCGTSIZE(0));
-
-
//遍历所有KV对
-
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
-
{
-
int h;
-
//对key做哈希
-
h = crc32_sz((char *) HS_KEY(hsent, ptr, i), HS_KEYLEN(hsent, i));
-
HASH(GETSIGN(res), h);
-
if (!HS_VALISNULL(hsent, i))
-
{
-
//对value做哈希
-
h = crc32_sz((char *) HS_VAL(hsent, ptr, i), HS_VALLEN(hsent, i));
-
HASH(GETSIGN(res), h);
-
}
-
}
-
-
retval = (GISTENTRY *) palloc(sizeof(GISTENTRY));
-
gistentryinit(*retval, PointerGetDatum(res),
-
entry->rel, entry->page,
-
entry->offset,
-
FALSE);
-
}
-
else if (!ISALLTRUE(DatumGetPointer(entry->key)))
-
{
-
int32 i;
-
GISTTYPE *res;
-
BITVECP sign = GETSIGN(DatumGetPointer(entry->key));
-
-
LOOPBYTE
-
{
-
if ((sign[i] & 0xff) != 0xff)
-
PG_RETURN_POINTER(retval);
-
}
-
-
res = (GISTTYPE *) palloc(CALCGTSIZE(ALLISTRUE));
-
SET_VARSIZE(res, CALCGTSIZE(ALLISTRUE));
-
res->flag = ALLISTRUE;
-
-
retval = (GISTENTRY *) palloc(sizeof(GISTENTRY));
-
gistentryinit(*retval, PointerGetDatum(res),
-
entry->rel, entry->page,
-
entry->offset,
-
FALSE);
-
}
-
-
PG_RETURN_POINTER(retval);
-
}
3.4 性能验证
1)环境
CentOS 6.5
PostgreSQL 9.4.0
2)测试数据准备
点击(此处)折叠或打开
-
testdb=# create extension hstore;
-
CREATE EXTENSION
-
Time: 235.391 ms
-
testdb=# create table tbhs(id serial,hs hstore);
-
CREATE TABLE
-
Time: 17.459 ms
-
testdb=# insert into tbhs select id,hstore(id::text, md5(id::text)) from generate_series(1,100000) id;
-
INSERT 0 100000
-
Time: 970.613 ms
-
testdb=# select pg_relation_size('tbhs');
-
pg_relation_size
-
------------------
-
8445952
-
(1 row)
-
-
Time: 0.643 ms
-
testdb=# select * from tbhs limit 5;
-
id | hs
-
----+-----------------------------------------
-
1 | "1"=>"c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b"
-
2 | "2"=>"c81e728d9d4c2f636f067f89cc14862c"
-
3 | "3"=>"eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3"
-
4 | "4"=>"a87ff679a2f3e71d9181a67b7542122c"
-
5 | "5"=>"e4da3b7fbbce2345d7772b0674a318d5"
-
(5 rows)
-
-
Time: 1.147 ms
注）上面每个记录只有一个键值对，且每个key都是唯一的，这样的数据模型就不适合使用hstore存储，本文故意这么做只是为了验证性能。
2)无索引的查询
点击(此处)折叠或打开
-
testdb=# explain (analyze,buffers) select * from tbhs where hs ? '10';
-
QUERY PLAN
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Seq Scan on tbhs (cost=0.00..2281.00 rows=100 width=53) (actual time=0.025..31.587 rows=1 loops=1)
-
Filter: (hs ? '10'::text)
-
Rows Removed by Filter: 99999
-
Buffers: shared hit=1031
-
Planning time: 0.055 ms
-
Execution time: 31.619 ms
-
(6 rows)
-
-
Time: 32.150 ms
3)建立GiST索引再查询
-
testdb=# create index tbhs_idx_gist on tbhs using gist(hs);
-
CREATE INDEX
-
Time: 6243.003 ms
-
testdb=# analyze tbhs;
-
ANALYZE
-
Time: 77.956 ms
-
testdb=# select pg_relation_size('tbhs_idx_gist'),pg_relation_size('tbhs_idx_gist')/8192 index_pages;
-
pg_relation_size | index_pages
-
------------------+-------------
-
4825088 | 589
-
(1 row)
-
-
Time: 0.456 ms
？查询扫描了45%（265/589）的索引页，Recheck了1.6%的数据行。
-
testdb=# explain (analyze,buffers) select * from tbhs where hs ? '10';
-
QUERY PLAN
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbhs (cost=5.06..302.42 rows=100 width=53) (actual time=3.003..4.637 rows=1 loops=1)
-
Recheck Cond: (hs ? '10'::text)
-
Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 1558
-
Heap Blocks: exact=863
-
Buffers: shared hit=1128
-
-> Bitmap Index Scan on tbhs_idx_gist (cost=0.00..5.03 rows=100 width=0) (actual time=2.869..2.869 rows=1559 loops=1)
-
Index Cond: (hs ? '10'::text)
-
Buffers: shared hit=265
-
Planning time: 0.153 ms
-
Execution time: 5.073 ms
-
(10 rows)
-
-
Time: 6.209 ms
@>查询扫描了19%（114/589）的索引页，Recheck了0.012%的数据行。
-
testdb=# explain (analyze,buffers) select * from tbhs where hs @> '1=>c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b';
-
QUERY PLAN
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbhs (cost=5.06..302.42 rows=100 width=53) (actual time=2.123..2.205 rows=1 loops=1)
-
Recheck Cond: (hs @> '"1"=>"c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b"'::hstore)
-
Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 11
-
Heap Blocks: exact=12
-
Buffers: shared hit=126
-
-> Bitmap Index Scan on tbhs_idx_gist (cost=0.00..5.03 rows=100 width=0) (actual time=2.097..2.097 rows=12 loops=1)
-
Index Cond: (hs @> '"1"=>"c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b"'::hstore)
-
Buffers: shared hit=114
-
Planning time: 0.407 ms
-
Execution time: 2.294 ms
-
(10 rows)
-
-
Time: 3.332 ms
4)建立GIN索引再查询
建立GIN索引对比一下。
-
testdb=# drop index tbhs_idx_gist;
-
DROP INDEX
-
Time: 7.036 ms
-
testdb=# create index tbhs_idx_gin on tbhs using gin(hs);
-
CREATE INDEX
-
Time: 2244.241 ms
-
testdb=# analyze tbhs;
-
ANALYZE
-
Time: 64.608 ms
-
testdb=# select pg_relation_size('tbhs_idx_gin'),pg_relation_size('tbhs_idx_gin')/8192 index_pages;
-
pg_relation_size | index_pages
-
------------------+-------------
-
17629184 | 2152
-
(1 row)
-
-
Time: 0.641 ms
-
testdb=# explain (analyze,buffers) select * from tbhs where hs ? '10';
-
QUERY PLAN
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbhs (cost=16.77..314.14 rows=100 width=53) (actual time=0.096..0.097 rows=1 loops=1)
-
Recheck Cond: (hs ? '10'::text)
-
Heap Blocks: exact=1
-
Buffers: shared hit=5
-
-> Bitmap Index Scan on tbhs_idx_gin (cost=0.00..16.75 rows=100 width=0) (actual time=0.086..0.086 rows=1 loops=1)
-
Index Cond: (hs ? '10'::text)
-
Buffers: shared hit=4
-
Planning time: 0.349 ms
-
Execution time: 0.144 ms
-
(9 rows)
-
-
Time: 1.014 ms
-
testdb=# explain (analyze,buffers) select * from tbhs where hs @> '1=>c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b';
-
QUERY PLAN
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbhs (cost=28.77..326.14 rows=100 width=53) (actual time=0.070..0.071 rows=1 loops=1)
-
Recheck Cond: (hs @> '"1"=>"c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b"'::hstore)
-
Heap Blocks: exact=1
-
Buffers: shared hit=8
-
-> Bitmap Index Scan on tbhs_idx_gin (cost=0.00..28.75 rows=100 width=0) (actual time=0.047..0.047 rows=1 loops=1)
-
Index Cond: (hs @> '"1"=>"c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b"'::hstore)
-
Buffers: shared hit=7
-
Planning time: 0.131 ms
-
Execution time: 0.105 ms
-
(9 rows)
-
-
Time: 0.661 ms
GIN索引的查询效率相当不错。GIN的缺点是：索引比较大，对更新速度有一定影响。
3.5 参考
http://blog.chinaunix.net/uid-20726500-id-4884626.html
http://blog.chinaunix.net/uid-20726500-id-4884681.html
http://blog.chinaunix.net/uid-20726500-id-4886571.html
http://blog.chinaunix.net/uid-259788-id-4279627.html
阅读(2872) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
