Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 474628
  • 博文数量: 112
  • 博客积分: 5696
  • 博客等级: 大校
  • 技术积分: 1720
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2007-08-17 09:58
文章分类

全部博文(112)

文章存档

2011年(22)

2010年(28)

2009年(21)

2008年(41)

分类: WINDOWS

2010-08-12 00:12:22

 An IoC container is a standard software component that supports and simplifies IoC. It lets
         you register a set of components (i.e., abstract types and your currently chosen concrete
         implementations), and then handles the business of instantiating them. You can configure
         and register components either with an XML file or with C# code (or both).
             At runtime, you can call a method similar to container.Resolve(Type type), where
         typecould be a particular interfaceor abstracttype or a particular concrete type, and the
         container will return an object satisfying that type definition, according to whatever concrete
         type is configured. It sounds trivial, but a good IoC container adds three extra clever features:

Dependency chain resolution: If you request a component that itself has dependencies
              (e.g., constructor parameters), the container will satisfy those dependencies recursively,
              so you can have component A, which depends on B, which depends on C, and so on. In
              other words, you can forget about the wiring on your component circuit board—just
             think about the components, because wiring happens magically.

              Object lifetime management: If you request component A more than once, should you get
             the same actual instance of A each time, or a fresh new instance each time? The container
             will usually let you configure the “lifestyle” of a component, allowing you to select from
             predefined options including singleton (the same instance each time), transient (a new
             instance each time), instance-per-thread, instance-from-a-pool, and so on.

             Explicit constructor parameter values configuration: For example, if the constructor for
             MembersRepositorydemands a string called connectionString, (as ours did earlier), you can configure a value for it in your XML config file. It’s a crude but simple configuration
              system that removes any need for your code to pass around connection strings, SMTP
              server addresses, and so on.

  So, in the preceding example, you’d configure MembersRepositoryas the active concrete
         implementation for IMembersRepository. Then, when some code calls container.Resolves
         (typeof(AdminController)), the container will figure out that to satisfy AdminController’
         constructor parameters it first needs an object implementing IMembersRepository. It will
         get one according to whatever concrete implementation you’ve configured (in this case,
         MembersRepository), supplying the connectionStringyou’ve configured. It will then use that to
         instantiate and return an AdminController.


阅读(412) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~