Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 19912015
  • 博文数量: 679
  • 博客积分: 10495
  • 博客等级: 上将
  • 技术积分: 9308
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2006-07-18 10:51
文章分类

全部博文(679)

文章存档

2012年(5)

2011年(38)

2010年(86)

2009年(145)

2008年(170)

2007年(165)

2006年(89)

分类: 项目管理

2011-04-08 14:21:02

测试软件开发工程师的职业路径
星期二,2011年4月5日上午09时42分

詹姆斯惠特克

测试软件开发工程师是主要书写测试代码和自动化的开发,他们实际上是开发。薪水和晋升通道也和开发完全一样。开发技能是测试软件开发工程师的的一部分。建议开发和测试软件开发工程师使用20%的时间做对方的工作。

上面是阅读时的笔记,具体文章比较简单,请参考原文:
http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2011/04/set-career-path.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FRLXA+%28Google+Testing+Blog%29

2011-4-7 磁针石

#承接软件自动化实施与培训等gtalk ouyangchongwu#gmail.com qq 37391319 博客:oychw.cublog.cn


#python qq group: 深圳自动化测试python群:113938272
#武冈深圳qq群:66250781



The SET Career Path

By James Whittaker

I've had a number of questions about the SET role and it seems I have confused folks when I say that the SWE is a tester and the SET is a tester and at the same time the SWE is a developer and the SET is a developer. What could possibly be confusing about that?

Oh, yeah. Right.

My next series of posts are going to detail the role of the SET and all will eventually be clear but some clarification on career path seems worthwhile.

SETs are developers who write test code and automation as their primary task. They are in every sense of the word a developer. When we interview SETs, SWEs are on the interview loop and SWE questions are asked. They are not all of the interview, but they are part of it.

This means that the skill set that our SETs possess makes them perfect candidates for switching to the SWE role. There is neither incentive nor deterrent to do so. SETs and SWEs are on the same pay scale and bonus structure (I have both roles reporting to me so I have real visibility into salary data) and their promotion velocity (again based on actual data) is roughly equivalent. This means that SETs have no outside influences to prompt them one way or the other.

The key factor is really the type of work you are doing. SETs who find themselves involved in SWE work usually convert to SWE. SWEs are also drawn in the opposite direction. Much of this happens through our 20% time work. Any SET interested in SWE work can take on a 20% task doing feature development. Any SWE interested in automation can find a group and sign up for a 20%. Right now I have both SWEs and SETs involved in such cross pollination.

The ideal situation is that the title reflects the actual work that you are involved in. So if an SET starts doing more feature dev work than automation, he or she should convert, same for SWEs doing automation work. In my time here, conversions in both directions have happened, but it is not all that common. The work of both roles is engaging, interesting and intense. Few Googlers are walking around bored.

Bottom line: do the work you are passionate about and capable of and the right job title will find you.



阅读(8109) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~