Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 18671992
  • 博文数量: 7460
  • 博客积分: 10434
  • 博客等级: 上将
  • 技术积分: 78178
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2008-03-02 22:54
文章分类

全部博文(7460)

文章存档

2011年(1)

2009年(669)

2008年(6790)

分类: 系统运维

2008-05-22 18:37:11

30.com/CMS/Files/Uploadimages/200609141829405388.JPG">点这里看大图

该选什么?这是群里朋友(CCIE_ing)问的一个问题.对此题目有人认为答案是C.解释是:

EIGRP重分发到OSPF中后默认类型是E2,路由表中表现的到达计算机B的路由条目的开销将不会变化(因为E2类型),所以数据包会通过OSPF区域中的3条路径(因为不考虑自身的COST后,到达B计算机的开销相同).

但是我对此表示疑惑,我认为选择的是B

因为,尽管是E2类型,在OSPF区域中所有路由器上关于到达B计算机的条目开销都不变,但是,OSPF区域本身自己是要选路的,最终数据是要通过B这个边界路由器的,A路由器在将数据递送到B路由器时候到底会选择哪条路?路由器A到路由器B这个过程,我觉得这是OSPF内部自己的事情.

在B路由器重分发后,B将通过它右边的3个接口向各自连接的路由器发送这条外部路由条目,这个条目将会这样表述:
到达B计算机网络通过我B路由器的右边接口,所以在C/D/E上都将会出现到达B计算机网络的条目,且开销都是100,但是各自下一接口将会不同,C将通过B最上面的接口,D将通过中间那个接口,E将通过下面那个接口.然后C/D/E又各自都向自己的右侧路由器通告这个路由条目,C通告给F,D通告给H,E通告给G,然后F,G再各自通告给H,最终完成通告,这其中的每一次再通告,COST开销虽是不变的,但是下一个接口都会改变.因此,既然每次接口都会改变,那么H路由器就应该考虑通过哪个接口是最优的.

(问了陕图一个老师,用5类LSA就好解释了,这个外部路由在OSPF数据库里表现为5类LSA,5类LSA只是告诉通过ASBR可以到达外部AS,怎么到达这个ASBR就是OSPF内部事情了,在这里0区域中,ASBR会发出1类LSA来在本区域内告知其他路由器,这里如果0区域还外联其他区域,那么在外联其他区域的ABR将把这个1类LSA转化成4类LSA)

为了验证我的想法我做了如下实验.

因为没有这么多路由器,我简化了拓扑,并用10M代替100M线路,用串口代替10M线路,根据开销大概算了下,不会因为这样的替换而影响实验前提的同一.

 

实验结果:

未分发前:
r1:
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    1.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
C       10.0.2.0 is directly connected, Serial1
C       10.0.3.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
C       10.0.1.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
O       10.0.4.0 [110/20] via 10.0.3.3, 00:01:22, Ethernet0
O       10.0.5.0 [110/84] via 10.0.3.3, 00:01:22, Ethernet0
r2
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    2.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
C       10.0.2.0 is directly connected, Serial1
O       10.0.3.0 [110/74] via 10.0.2.1, 00:01:51, Serial1
O       10.0.1.0 [110/74] via 10.0.2.1, 00:01:51, Serial1
O       10.0.4.0 [110/74] via 10.0.5.4, 00:01:51, Serial0
C       10.0.5.0 is directly connected, Serial0
r3
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    3.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
O       10.0.2.0 [110/74] via 10.0.3.1, 00:02:08, Ethernet0
C       10.0.3.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
O       10.0.1.0 [110/20] via 10.0.3.1, 00:02:08, Ethernet0
C       10.0.4.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
O       10.0.5.0 [110/74] via 10.0.4.4, 00:02:08, Ethernet1
r4
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    4.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C       172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1
D       172.16.2.0 [90/2297856] via 172.16.1.5, 00:08:31, Serial1
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
O       10.0.2.0 [110/84] via 10.0.4.3, 00:02:24, Ethernet0
O       10.0.3.0 [110/20] via 10.0.4.3, 00:02:24, Ethernet0
O       10.0.1.0 [110/30] via 10.0.4.3, 00:02:24, Ethernet0
C       10.0.4.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
C       10.0.5.0 is directly connected, Serial0
r5
Gateway of last resort is not set

     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C       172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1
C       172.16.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
C    192.168.0.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0

=============
重分发后
r1
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    1.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O E2    172.16.1.0 [110/100] via 10.0.3.3, 00:19:26, Ethernet0
O E2    172.16.3.0 [110/100] via 10.0.3.3, 00:03:31, Ethernet0
这里看出,R1到达目标网络全部通过了R3路由器的接口

     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
C       10.0.2.0 is directly connected, Serial1
C       10.0.3.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
C       10.0.1.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
O       10.0.4.0 [110/20] via 10.0.3.3, 00:19:26, Ethernet0
O       10.0.5.0 [110/84] via 10.0.3.3, 00:19:27, Ethernet0
r2
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    2.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O E2    172.16.1.0 [110/100] via 10.0.5.4, 00:20:22, Serial0
O E2    172.16.3.0 [110/100] via 10.0.5.4, 00:04:26, Serial0

     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
C       10.0.2.0 is directly connected, Serial1
O       10.0.3.0 [110/74] via 10.0.2.1, 00:20:22, Serial1
O       10.0.1.0 [110/74] via 10.0.2.1, 00:20:22, Serial1
O       10.0.4.0 [110/74] via 10.0.5.4, 00:20:22, Serial0
C       10.0.5.0 is directly connected, Serial0
r3
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    3.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O E2    172.16.1.0 [110/100] via 10.0.4.4, 00:20:44, Ethernet1
O E2    172.16.3.0 [110/100] via 10.0.4.4, 00:04:49, Ethernet1

     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
O       10.0.2.0 [110/74] via 10.0.3.1, 00:20:44, Ethernet0
C       10.0.3.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
O       10.0.1.0 [110/20] via 10.0.3.1, 00:20:44, Ethernet0
C       10.0.4.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
O       10.0.5.0 [110/74] via 10.0.4.4, 00:20:45, Ethernet1
r4
Gateway of last resort is not set

C    4.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C       172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1
D       172.16.3.0 [90/2195456] via 172.16.1.5, 00:05:12, Serial1

     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
O       10.0.2.0 [110/84] via 10.0.4.3, 00:21:08, Ethernet0
O       10.0.3.0 [110/20] via 10.0.4.3, 00:21:08, Ethernet0
O       10.0.1.0 [110/30] via 10.0.4.3, 00:21:08, Ethernet0
C       10.0.4.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
C       10.0.5.0 is directly connected, Serial0

r5
Gateway of last resort is not set

     5.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       5.5.5.5 is directly connected, Loopback0
     172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C       172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1
C       172.16.3.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
D EX    10.0.2.0 [170/3072256] via 172.16.1.4, 00:02:24, Serial1
D EX    10.0.3.0 [170/3072256] via 172.16.1.4, 00:02:24, Serial1
D EX    10.0.1.0 [170/3072256] via 172.16.1.4, 00:02:24, Serial1
D EX    10.0.4.0 [170/3072256] via 172.16.1.4, 00:02:25, Serial1
D EX    10.0.5.0 [170/3072256] via 172.16.1.4, 00:02:25, Serial1

为了避免实验自身问题,我特意关闭了R1上的E0来测试R1的S1接口是否能正常路由,测试结果表明,我关闭E0后,去往目标网络的全部走R2的接口了,而我一旦启用R1的E1接口,路由便又恢复成通过R3的接口.请见这个这个文本里的测试过程.

下面的连接是整个环境的完整配置:

不知道整个过程是否有错,我也担心我是否陷入了思维定试,有不同观点.谢谢.目的为了弄明白原理.

阅读(493) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~