对于SPI的一些结构体都有所了解之后呢,那么再去瞧瞧SPI的那些长见的操作的函数了。
首先看一下本人画的比较挫的数据流了,仅供参考,如有不对,不吝赐教
接下来看看各个函数吧还是:
SPI write
-
/**
-
* spi_write - SPI synchronous write
-
* @spi: device to which data will be written
-
* @buf: data buffer
-
* @len: data buffer size
-
* Context: can sleep
-
*
-
* This writes the buffer and returns zero or a negative error code.
-
* Callable only from contexts that can sleep.
-
*/
-
static inline int
-
spi_write(struct spi_device *spi, const void *buf, size_t len)
-
{
-
struct spi_transfer t = {
-
.tx_buf = buf,
-
.len = len,
-
};
-
struct spi_message m;
-
-
spi_message_init(&m);
-
spi_message_add_tail(&t, &m);
-
return spi_sync(spi, &m);
-
-
}
SPI发送函数,数据放在buf中,然后把要发送的数据放在工作队列中
SPI read
-
/**
-
* spi_read - SPI synchronous read
-
* @spi: device from which data will be read
-
* @buf: data buffer
-
* @len: data buffer size
-
* Context: can sleep
-
*
-
* This reads the buffer and returns zero or a negative error code.
-
* Callable only from contexts that can sleep.
-
*/
-
static inline int
-
spi_read(struct spi_device *spi, void *buf, size_t len)
-
{
-
struct spi_transfer t = {
-
.rx_buf = buf,
-
.len = len,
-
};
-
struct spi_message m;
-
-
spi_message_init(&m);
-
spi_message_add_tail(&t, &m);
-
return spi_sync(spi, &m);
-
}
SPI接收函数,数据放在buf中,然后把要发送的数据放在工作队列中,发送出去
SPI write 8 bits read 8 bits
-
/* this copies txbuf and rxbuf data; for small transfers only! */
-
extern int spi_write_then_read(struct spi_device *spi,
-
const void *txbuf, unsigned n_tx,
-
void *rxbuf, unsigned n_rx);
-
/**
-
* spi_w8r8 - SPI synchronous 8 bit write followed by 8 bit read
-
* @spi: device with which data will be exchanged
-
* @cmd: command to be written before data is read back
-
* Context: can sleep
-
*
-
* This returns the (unsigned) eight bit number returned by the
-
* device, or else a negative error code. Callable only from
-
* contexts that can sleep.
-
*/
-
static inline ssize_t spi_w8r8(struct spi_device *spi, u8 cmd)
-
{
-
ssize_t status;
-
u8 result;
-
status = spi_write_then_read(spi, &cmd, 1, &result, 1);
-
-
/* return negative errno or unsigned value */
-
return (status < 0) ? status : result;
-
}
SPI write 8 bit read 16 bits
-
/**
-
* spi_w8r16 - SPI synchronous 8 bit write followed by 16 bit read
-
* @spi: device with which data will be exchanged
-
* @cmd: command to be written before data is read back
-
* Context: can sleep
-
*
-
* This returns the (unsigned) sixteen bit number returned by the
-
* device, or else a negative error code. Callable only from
-
* contexts that can sleep.
-
*
-
* The number is returned in wire-order, which is at least sometimes
-
* big-endian.
-
*/
-
static inline ssize_t spi_w8r16(struct spi_device *spi, u8 cmd)
-
{
-
ssize_t status;
-
u16 result;
-
-
status = spi_write_then_read(spi, &cmd, 1, (u8 *) &result, 2);
-
-
/* return negative errno or unsigned value */
-
return (status < 0) ? status : result;
-
}
-
int spi_write_then_read(struct spi_device *spi,
-
const void *txbuf, unsigned n_tx,
-
void *rxbuf, unsigned n_rx)
-
{
-
static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
-
-
int status;
-
struct spi_message message;
-
struct spi_transfer x[2];
-
u8 *local_buf;
-
-
/* Use preallocated DMA-safe buffer. We can't avoid copying here,
-
* (as a pure convenience thing), but we can keep heap costs
-
* out of the hot path ...
-
*/
-
if ((n_tx + n_rx) > SPI_BUFSIZ)
-
return -EINVAL;
-
-
spi_message_init(&message);
-
memset(x, 0, sizeof x);
-
if (n_tx) {
-
x[0].len = n_tx;
-
spi_message_add_tail(&x[0], &message);
-
}
-
if (n_rx) {
-
x[1].len = n_rx;
-
spi_message_add_tail(&x[1], &message);
-
}
-
-
/* ... unless someone else is using the pre-allocated buffer */
-
if (!mutex_trylock(&lock)) {
-
local_buf = kmalloc(SPI_BUFSIZ, GFP_KERNEL);
-
if (!local_buf)
-
return -ENOMEM;
-
} else
-
local_buf = buf;
-
-
memcpy(local_buf, txbuf, n_tx);
-
x[0].tx_buf = local_buf;
-
x[1].rx_buf = local_buf + n_tx;
-
/* do the i/o */
-
status = spi_sync(spi, &message);
-
if (status == 0)
-
memcpy(rxbuf, x[1].rx_buf, n_rx);
-
-
if (x[0].tx_buf == buf)
-
mutex_unlock(&lock);
-
else
-
kfree(local_buf);
-
-
return status;
-
}
SPI sync
读写都会调用到spi_sync
-
int spi_sync(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message)
-
{
-
return __spi_sync(spi, message, 0);
-
}
接着调用了__spi_sync
-
static int __spi_sync(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message,
-
int bus_locked)
-
{
-
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
-
int status;
-
struct spi_master *master = spi->master;
-
-
message->complete = spi_complete;
-
message->context = &done;
-
-
if (!bus_locked)
-
mutex_lock(&master->bus_lock_mutex);
-
status = spi_async_locked(spi, message);
-
-
if (!bus_locked)
-
mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex);
-
-
if (status == 0) {
-
wait_for_completion(&done);
-
status = message->status;
-
}
-
message->context = NULL;
-
return status;
-
}
然后就是spi_async
-
int spi_async(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message)
-
{
-
struct spi_master *master = spi->master;
-
int ret;
-
unsigned long flags;
-
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags);
-
-
if (master->bus_lock_flag)
-
ret = -EBUSY;
-
else
-
ret = __spi_async(spi, message);
-
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags);
-
-
return ret;
-
}
最后调用__spi_async
-
static int __spi_async(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message)
-
{
-
struct spi_master *master = spi->master;
-
-
/* Half-duplex links include original MicroWire, and ones with
-
* only one data pin like SPI_3WIRE (switches direction) or where
-
* either MOSI or MISO is missing. They can also be caused by
-
* software limitations.
-
*/
-
if ((master->flags & SPI_MASTER_HALF_DUPLEX)
-
|| (spi->mode & SPI_3WIRE)) {
-
struct spi_transfer *xfer;
-
unsigned flags = master->flags;
-
-
list_for_each_entry(xfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) {
-
if (xfer->rx_buf && xfer->tx_buf)
-
return -EINVAL;
-
if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_TX) && xfer->tx_buf)
-
return -EINVAL;
-
if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_RX) && xfer->rx_buf)
-
return -EINVAL;
-
}
-
}
-
-
message->spi = spi;
-
message->status = -EINPROGRESS;
-
return master->transfer(spi, message);
-
}
返回了master->transfer(spi, message);那么就是控制器里去工作了。
我用的是gpio模拟的spi,所以那用gpio模拟的那个控制器去看控制器的处理了。
先还是看一下probe函数
主要看下下面三个函数
-
spi_gpio->bitbang.txrx_word[SPI_MODE_0] = spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode0;
-
-
spi_gpio->bitbang.setup_transfer = spi_bitbang_setup_transfer;
-
-
status = spi_bitbang_start(&spi_gpio->bitbang);
spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode0;就是最后调用到的先放一边,spi_bitbang_start,看一下这个函数
看到这个函数指针了吧:
-
if (!bitbang->master->transfer)
-
-
bitbang->master->transfer = spi_bitbang_transfer;
那么设备驱动调用的master->transfer(spi, message);就是调用到了spi_bitbang_transfer了,
-
/**
-
-
* spi_bitbang_transfer - default submit to transfer queue
-
-
*/
-
-
int spi_bitbang_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *m)
-
-
{
-
-
struct spi_bitbang *bitbang;
-
-
unsigned long flags;
-
-
int status = 0;
-
-
-
-
m->actual_length = 0;
-
-
m->status = -EINPROGRESS;
-
-
-
-
bitbang = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
-
-
-
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&bitbang->lock, flags);
-
-
if (!spi->max_speed_hz)
-
-
status = -ENETDOWN;
-
-
else {
-
-
list_add_tail(&m->queue, &bitbang->queue);
-
-
queue_work(bitbang->workqueue, &bitbang->work);
-
-
}
-
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bitbang->lock, flags);
-
-
-
-
return status;
-
-
}
这里是把信息加到了bitbang->workqueue,然后在bitbang->work里处理
再来看下bitbang->work做了什么
-
static void bitbang_work(struct work_struct *work)
-
-
{
-
-
struct spi_bitbang *bitbang =
-
-
container_of(work, struct spi_bitbang, work);
-
-
unsigned long flags;
-
-
-
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&bitbang->lock, flags);
-
-
bitbang->busy = 1;
-
-
while (!list_empty(&bitbang->queue)) {
-
-
struct spi_message *m;
-
-
struct spi_device *spi;
-
-
unsigned nsecs;
-
-
struct spi_transfer *t = NULL;
-
-
unsigned tmp;
-
-
unsigned cs_change;
-
-
int status;
-
-
int do_setup = -1;
-
-
-
-
m = container_of(bitbang->queue.next, struct spi_message,
-
-
queue);
-
-
list_del_init(&m->queue);
-
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bitbang->lock, flags);
-
-
-
-
/* FIXME this is made-up ... the correct value is known to
-
-
* word-at-a-time bitbang code, and presumably chipselect()
-
-
* should enforce these requirements too?
-
-
*/
-
-
nsecs = 100;
-
-
-
-
spi = m->spi;
-
-
tmp = 0;
-
-
cs_change = 1;
-
-
status = 0;
-
-
-
-
list_for_each_entry (t, &m->transfers, transfer_list) {
-
-
-
-
/* override speed or wordsize? */
-
-
if (t->speed_hz || t->bits_per_word)
-
-
do_setup = 1;
-
-
-
-
/* init (-1) or override (1) transfer params */
-
-
if (do_setup != 0) {
-
-
status = bitbang->setup_transfer(spi, t);
-
-
if (status < 0)
-
-
break;
-
-
if (do_setup == -1)
-
-
do_setup = 0;
-
-
}
-
-
-
-
/* set up default clock polarity, and activate chip;
-
-
* this implicitly updates clock and spi modes as
-
-
* previously recorded for this device via setup().
-
-
* (and also deselects any other chip that might be
-
-
* selected ...)
-
-
*/
-
-
if (cs_change) {
-
-
bitbang->chipselect(spi, BITBANG_CS_ACTIVE);
-
-
ndelay(nsecs);
-
-
}
-
-
cs_change = t->cs_change;
-
-
if (!t->tx_buf && !t->rx_buf && t->len) {
-
-
status = -EINVAL;
-
-
break;
-
-
}
-
-
-
-
/* transfer data. the lower level code handles any
-
-
* new dma mappings it needs. our caller always gave
-
-
* us dma-safe buffers.
-
-
*/
-
-
if (t->len) {
-
-
/* REVISIT dma API still needs a designated
-
-
* DMA_ADDR_INVALID; ~0 might be better.
-
-
*/
-
-
if (!m->is_dma_mapped)
-
-
t->rx_dma = t->tx_dma = 0;
-
-
status = bitbang->txrx_bufs(spi, t);
-
-
}
-
-
if (status > 0)
-
-
m->actual_length += status;
-
-
if (status != t->len) {
-
-
/* always report some kind of error */
-
-
if (status >= 0)
-
-
status = -EREMOTEIO;
-
-
break;
-
-
}
-
-
status = 0;
-
-
-
-
/* protocol tweaks before next transfer */
-
-
if (t->delay_usecs)
-
-
udelay(t->delay_usecs);
-
-
-
-
if (!cs_change)
-
-
continue;
-
-
if (t->transfer_list.next == &m->transfers)
-
-
break;
-
-
-
-
/* sometimes a short mid-message deselect of the chip
-
-
* may be needed to terminate a mode or command
-
-
*/
-
-
ndelay(nsecs);
-
-
bitbang->chipselect(spi, BITBANG_CS_INACTIVE);
-
-
ndelay(nsecs);
-
-
}
-
-
-
-
m->status = status;
-
-
m->complete(m->context);
-
-
-
-
/* normally deactivate chipselect ... unless no error and
-
-
* cs_change has hinted that the next message will probably
-
-
* be for this chip too.
-
-
*/
-
-
if (!(status == 0 && cs_change)) {
-
-
ndelay(nsecs);
-
-
bitbang->chipselect(spi, BITBANG_CS_INACTIVE);
-
-
ndelay(nsecs);
-
-
}
-
-
-
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&bitbang->lock, flags);
-
-
}
-
-
bitbang->busy = 0;
-
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bitbang->lock, flags);
-
-
}
当队列非空的时候就一直去取队列的数据,然后会执行到
-
status = bitbang->setup_transfer(spi, t);
这个函数,因为在spi_bitbang_start中
-
if (!bitbang->txrx_bufs) {
-
-
bitbang->use_dma = 0;
-
-
bitbang->txrx_bufs = spi_bitbang_bufs;
-
-
if (!bitbang->master->setup) {
-
-
if (!bitbang->setup_transfer)
-
-
bitbang->setup_transfer =
-
-
spi_bitbang_setup_transfer;
-
-
bitbang->master->setup = spi_bitbang_setup;
-
-
bitbang->master->cleanup = spi_bitbang_cleanup;
-
-
}
-
-
}
所以就调用了spi_bitbang_setup_transfer;
-
int spi_bitbang_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *t)
-
-
{
-
-
struct spi_bitbang_cs *cs = spi->controller_state;
-
-
u8 bits_per_word;
-
-
u32 hz;
-
-
-
-
if (t) {
-
-
bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word;
-
-
hz = t->speed_hz;
-
-
} else {
-
-
bits_per_word = 0;
-
-
hz = 0;
-
-
}
-
-
-
-
/* spi_transfer level calls that work per-word */
-
-
if (!bits_per_word)
-
-
bits_per_word = spi->bits_per_word;
-
-
if (bits_per_word <= 8)
-
-
cs->txrx_bufs = bitbang_txrx_8;
-
-
else if (bits_per_word <= 16)
-
-
cs->txrx_bufs = bitbang_txrx_16;
-
-
else if (bits_per_word <= 32)
-
-
cs->txrx_bufs = bitbang_txrx_32;
-
-
else
-
-
return -EINVAL;
-
-
-
-
/* nsecs = (clock period)/2 */
-
-
if (!hz)
-
-
hz = spi->max_speed_hz;
-
-
if (hz) {
-
-
cs->nsecs = (1000000000/2) / hz;
-
-
if (cs->nsecs > (MAX_UDELAY_MS * 1000 * 1000))
-
-
return -EINVAL;
-
-
}
-
-
-
-
return 0;
-
-
}
这里主要是根据bits_per_word选择传输的方式,分8、16,、32三种模式,ads7843touchscreen是用bits_per_word默认没有,选择bitbang_txrx_8的。
-
static unsigned bitbang_txrx_8(
-
-
struct spi_device *spi,
-
-
u32 (*txrx_word)(struct spi_device *spi,
-
-
unsigned nsecs,
-
-
u32 word, u8 bits),
-
-
unsigned ns,
-
-
struct spi_transfer *t
-
-
) {
-
-
unsigned bits = t->bits_per_word ? : spi->bits_per_word;
-
-
unsigned count = t->len;
-
-
const u8 *tx = t->tx_buf;
-
-
u8 *rx = t->rx_buf;
-
-
-
-
while (likely(count > 0)) {
-
-
u8 word = 0;
-
-
-
-
if (tx)
-
-
word = *tx++;
-
-
word = txrx_word(spi, ns, word, bits);
-
-
if (rx)
-
-
*rx++ = word;
-
-
count -= 1;
-
-
}
-
-
return t->len - count;
-
-
}
-
-
这里word = txrx_word(spi, ns, word, bits);会调用到哪里呢?,首先看下这个函数的指针指向哪里。
在spi_bitbang_start中,bitbang->master->setup = spi_bitbang_setup;
然后在spi_bitbang_setup 中有
-
cs->txrx_word = bitbang->txrx_word[spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL|SPI_CPHA)];
所以,这个最终还是调用到了spi_gpio.c文件中的spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode0
-
static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode0(struct spi_device *spi,
-
-
unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits)
-
-
{
-
-
unsigned flags = spi->master->flags;
-
-
return bitbang_txrx_be_cpha0(spi, nsecs, 0, flags, word, bits);
-
-
}
然后这个函数就调用了bitbang_txrx_be_cpha0,这个函数在spi-bitbang-txrx.h中
-
static inline u32
-
-
bitbang_txrx_be_cpha0(struct spi_device *spi,
-
-
unsigned nsecs, unsigned cpol, unsigned flags,
-
-
u32 word, u8 bits)
-
-
{
-
-
/* if (cpol == 0) this is SPI_MODE_0; else this is SPI_MODE_2 */
-
-
-
-
/* clock starts at inactive polarity */
-
-
for (word <<= (32 - bits); likely(bits); bits--) {
-
-
-
-
/* setup MSB (to slave) on trailing edge */
-
-
if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_TX) == 0)
-
-
setmosi(spi, word & (1 << 31));
-
-
spidelay(nsecs); /* T(setup) */
-
-
-
-
setsck(spi, !cpol);
-
-
spidelay(nsecs);
-
-
-
-
/* sample MSB (from slave) on leading edge */
-
-
word <<= 1;
-
-
if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_RX) == 0)
-
-
word |= getmiso(spi);
-
-
setsck(spi, cpol);
-
-
}
-
-
return word;
-
-
}
这里就是gpio模拟的spi总线的协议过程了。这样,从最上面设备程序调用到控制器的整个数据流就结束了。
注:这里有一个很恶心的东东,就是在bitbang_txrx_16,bitbang_txrx_32中的
-
const u8 *tx = t->tx_buf;
-
-
u8 *rx = t->rx_buf;
这里是强制转换的,由于大小端的问题,可能导致数据相反,从而传输会出现问题的,如果是8bit的,那么就没有任何问题了。
一段小插曲,也是用逻辑分析仪抓到的数据才发现的,如果没有这玩意儿,估计现在还纠结着。
OK,至此,的SPI的数据传输就到这里了。
阅读(3167) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |