Before the Spring Festival in hand to do good for the blind massage massage center

, next to a middle-aged teacher complained to the massage that the body where all the pain, especially the skull, feeling to be blown up. Chat that this man is the boss of private enterprises, are assisted by hundreds of employees, business is a very busy and have so much to work every day work, kept talking, ever met, ever call, often a day down, feeling sapped, as has been hollowing out of the same. Night as busy as ever, there is always entertaining. Have come to understand this man's pain, I also have such an experience: sometimes busy day, constantly talking to the night, then more trouble, and really felt collapse. So, at that time thought he was such a person in society was very much attention of the rich man, the boss, but from the time point of view, such people rarely idle, is not it is another kind of "poor" mean? If you combine the time and wealth, people rich and the poor state can thus make a new division. One is "no money, no idle" people, this is no doubt that the "extreme poverty"; and the second is "no money leisure" and "rich and poor people", such a person from the perspective of the wealth of the poor , but from the perspective of time is a rich, full time Well. The third was "no idle rich" and "rich poor", which from the perspective of the wealth of the rich, from the perspective of time is poor, poor in time. The fourth, "the idle rich" and "pure rich", such a person either in wealth or the time is very rich, there is a human ideal state. But the greatest danger is that this state of emptiness, because the rich have leisure, and if not pursued, will truly experience the vanity of torture. Of course, this is only from there, without these two extreme situations as the standard for points in real life, many people are in the intermediate state, both a little money, it is busy as ever, little money and bet not many be regarded as "sub-well-off", "well-off", "off +" bar. Therefore, a man who preferred to do a fourth, even if there are empty threats. Best not to vote is the first one, it was the worst living conditions. The second, third, most people would choose a third, that is, to become a "rich poor", but the second some of the candidates to see what the individual value. As for the "off" state, not easy to come, but also depends on where you were born, effort, opportunities, etc. prevail.