Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 713099
  • 博文数量: 112
  • 博客积分: 10010
  • 博客等级: 上将
  • 技术积分: 1192
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2008-03-12 16:46
文章分类

全部博文(112)

文章存档

2009年(4)

2008年(108)

我的朋友

分类: 系统运维

2008-04-16 10:03:30

A Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Simulators
2007-10-21 10:45
Tran Minh Tam's Weblog -

According to my survey, there are many simulators in the literatures and practice:

1. TOSSIM:

  • A TinyOS mote simulator which is useful for testing both the algorithms and implementations
  • Allowing experimentation with low-level protocols in addition to top-level application systems
  • Tython:
    • A scripting environment which uses TOSSIM for testing and analyzing sensor network applications

2. NS-2:

  • Discrete event simulator: provides support for simulation of TCP, routing, and multicast protocols over wired and wireless (local and satellite) networks.
  • Pros:
    • Separate protocol implementation from scenario scripting
  • Cons:
    • No support for WSN (need extensions)
    • Mixture of oTcl and C++

3. Mannasim (NS-2 Extension for WSN):

  • Pros:
    • Have SGT (Script Generator Tool): front-end of for TCL script creation, written in Java, reducing the burden of programmer

4. SENSE:

  • Pros:
    • Extensibility: Component-port Model & Simulation Component Classification
    • Reusability: extensive use of C++ template
    • Scalability
  • Cons:
    • All simulations require writing C++ code

5. OMNet++:

  • Pros:
    • Strong GUI support
    • Provides Component architecture for models. Components (modules) are written in C++, then assembled into larger components and models using a high-level language (NED).
  • Discrete event simulator with many extensions for wireless network simulation.
  • NesCT:
    • Convert nesC classes to C++ classes for OMNet++

6. Castalia (OMNet++ Extension for WSN):

  • Pros:
    • Generic reliable and realistic framework for the first order validation of an algorithm before moving to implementation on a specific sensor platform

7. J-Sim (formerly Java-Sim):

  • Pros:
    • Component-oriented architecture instead of OO design like NS-2
    • Platform neutral
    • Extensible
    • Reusable
  • Cons:
    • Low performance (for large WSN simulation)

8. Qualnet (formerly GloMoSim):

9. VisualSense (for Ptolemy II):

10. AlgoSenSim:

  • It is not protocol stack oriented but algorithm oriented: localization, distributed routing, flooding…

11. GTNetS:

12. Other Simulators:

  • SensorSim: DIED
  • WISENET: For AVR IS
  • atemu: For AVR IS and MICA2 board components
  • Shawn: Not much documentation
  • Avrora: for AVR IS and MICA2 board components
阅读(2349) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~