Chinaunix首页 | 论坛 | 博客
  • 博客访问: 409010
  • 博文数量: 78
  • 博客积分: 3642
  • 博客等级: 中校
  • 技术积分: 695
  • 用 户 组: 普通用户
  • 注册时间: 2006-10-23 15:33
文章分类

全部博文(78)

文章存档

2007年(53)

2006年(25)

分类:

2007-03-09 13:31:35

[转]%3Ben-us%3B168371&x=15&y=13


How To IObjectSafety Marks ATL Controls Safe for Initializing

Article ID:168371
Last Review:July 1, 2004
Revision:2.1
This article was previously published under Q168371

SUMMARY

You can use the default implementation of IObjectSafetyImpl to mark a control as safe for scripting. In many cases, you will also want to mark the control as safe for initialization.

NOTE: Only mark your control as safe for scripting or initialization if it really is safe. If the control is potentially unsafe and it is marked as safe, you may be held liable for damages. See the REFERENCES section below for more information.

Back to the top

MORE INFORMATION

The steps you need to take to get the desired functionality involve using IObjectSafetyImpl as one of the classes that your control derives from and overriding GetInterfaceSafetyOptions and SetInterfaceSafetyOptions. This allows you to implement the desired functionality, which in this case means marking the control as safe for scripting and initialization.

To use IObjectSafetyImpl, you need to add it to the list of classes your control is derived from. For example, in the Polygon tutorial you see the following:
class ATL_NO_VTABLE CPolyCtl :
...
public IObjectSafetyImpl // ATL's version of
// IObjectSafety
{
public:
BEGIN_COM_MAP(CPolyCtl)
...
COM_INTERFACE_ENTRY_IMPL(IObjectSafety) // Tie IObjectSafety
// to this COM map
END_COM_MAP()

STDMETHOD(GetInterfaceSafetyOptions)(REFIID riid,
DWORD *pdwSupportedOptions,
DWORD *pdwEnabledOptions)
{
ATLTRACE(_T("CObjectSafetyImpl::GetInterfaceSafetyOptions\n"));
if (!pdwSupportedOptions || !pdwEnabledOptions)
return E_FAIL;
LPUNKNOWN pUnk;
if (_InternalQueryInterface (riid, (void**)&pUnk) == E_NOINTERFACE) {
// Our object doesn't even support this interface.
return E_NOINTERFACE;
}else{
// Cleanup after ourselves.
pUnk->Release();
pUnk = NULL;
}
if (riid == IID_IDispatch) {
// IDispatch is an interface used for scripting. If your
// control supports other IDispatch or Dual interfaces, you
// may decide to add them here as well. Client wants to know
// if object is safe for scripting. Only indicate safe for
// scripting when the interface is safe.
*pdwSupportedOptions = INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER;
*pdwEnabledOptions = m_dwSafety &
INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER;
return S_OK;
}else if ((riid == IID_IPersistStreamInit) ||
(riid == IID_IPersistStorage)) {
// IID_IPersistStreamInit and IID_IPersistStorage are
// interfaces used for Initialization. If your control
// supports other Persistence interfaces, you may decide to
// add them here as well. Client wants to know if object is
// safe for initializing. Only indicate safe for initializing
// when the interface is safe.
*pdwSupportedOptions = INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA;
*pdwEnabledOptions = m_dwSafety &
INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA;
return S_OK;
}else{
// We are saying that no other interfaces in this control are
// safe for initializing or scripting.
*pdwSupportedOptions = 0;
*pdwEnabledOptions = 0;
return E_FAIL;
}
}

STDMETHOD(SetInterfaceSafetyOptions)(REFIID riid,
DWORD dwOptionSetMask,
DWORD dwEnabledOptions)
{
ATLTRACE(_T("CObjectSafetyImpl::SetInterfaceSafetyOptions\n"));
if (!dwOptionSetMask && !dwEnabledOptions) return E_FAIL;
LPUNKNOWN pUnk;
if (_InternalQueryInterface (riid, (void**)&pUnk) == E_NOINTERFACE) {
// Our object doesn't even support this interface.
return E_NOINTERFACE;
}else{
// Cleanup after ourselves.
pUnk->Release();
pUnk = NULL;
}
// Store our current safety level to return in
// GetInterfaceSafetyOptions
m_dwSafety |= dwEnabledOptions & dwOptionSetMask;
if ((riid == IID_IDispatch) &&
(m_dwSafety & INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER)) {
// Client wants us to disable any functionality that would
// make the control unsafe for scripting. The same applies to
// any other IDispatch or Dual interfaces your control may
// support. Because our control is safe for scripting by
// default we just return S_OK.
return S_OK;
}else if (((riid == IID_IPersistStreamInit) ||
(riid == IID_IPersistStorage)) &&
(m_dwSafety & INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA)) {
// Client wants us to make the control safe for initializing
// from persistent data. For these interfaces, this control
// is safe so we return S_OK. For Any interfaces that are not
// safe, we would return E_FAIL.
return S_OK;
}else{
// This control doesn't allow Initialization or Scripting
// from any other interfaces so return E_FAIL.
return E_FAIL;
}
}
...
}

In ATL 3.0, the implementation of IObjectSafetyImpl has changed so that you can now provide the safety options as a template parameter. For example, the declaration of the class above would appear as
class ATL_NO_VTABLE CPolyCtl :
...
public IObjectSafetyImpl INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER |
INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA>
{
public:
BEGIN_COM_MAP(CPolyCtl)
...
and you would not have to override the two methods. For additional information, click the article number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
() PRB: Compiler Errors When Porting IObjectSafetyImpl to ATL 3.0

Back to the top

REFERENCES

For additional information about marking ActiveX controls as safe for scripting and initialization, please see the following articles in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
() How To Mark MFC Controls Safe for Scripting/Initialization

() SAMPLE: Implementing IObjectSafety in an ActiveX control
For in-depth coverage on developing an ActiveX control and deploying it on the Web, see Paul Johns' article "The ABCs of MFC ActiveX Controls" at:
http://microsoft.com/intdev/controls/stoplite/ (http://microsoft.com/intdev/controls/stoplite/)
For topics relevant to this discussion see his companion article "Signing and Marking ActiveX Controls" at:
http://microsoft.com/intdev/controls/signmark-f.htm (http://microsoft.com/intdev/controls/signmark-f.htm)
(c) Microsoft Corporation 1997, All Rights Reserved. Contributions by Shawn W. Karr, Microsoft Corporation

Back to the top

阅读(3783) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
给主人留下些什么吧!~~