IRVING, Texas -- Dallas Cowboys coaches wont be talking to linebacker Sean Lee through his helmet mic anymore this season.
.
Instead, he might be in their ears all the time on the sideline.
Lee is out for the rest of the season with ligament damage in his right
big toe, an injury that will require surgery. Coach Jason Garrett said
Wednesday an MRI showed the extent of the damage and the teams leading
tackler and on-the-field defensive co-ordinator was placed on injured
reserve. He will have surgery in about a week.
Lee was injured in the second half of last weekends 19-14 win against
Carolina, and he was already donning a headset before the game ended.
"I remember seeing him on the head phones on the sidelines," said his
replacement, Dan Connor, an off-season pickup in free agency. "He was
really coaching out there. Theres no reason why he shouldnt."
Its not the first time Lee has been sidelined by a significant injury.
He missed a year with a torn knee ligament at Penn State, and he could
have missed a significant stretch last year with a dislocated wrist. He
ended up sitting for a game and a half before coming back and playing
the rest of the season with a cast.
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said Lee didnt want to believe he needed
season-ending surgery this time, but ultimately knew better.
"He has such an intensity about him," Garrett said. "He said, You know,
Im not getting down. Im ready to go Im going be part of this football
team and were going to get this thing fixed. Ill be back before you know
it."
The Cowboys moved up in the draft to take Lee in the second round in
2010, and he was still available in part because of his history with
injuries. He started 15 games last year, finishing with 105 tackles and
tying for the team lead with four interceptions. He had 58 tackles in
six games this year and another interception.
"I cant tell you how well hes been playing since hes been our starting
inside linebacker," Garrett said. "Hes a bell cow for us and a guy that
really everybody on our defence and football team looks up to."
Connor will replace Lee as a starter heading into Sundays home game
against the Giants, but the Cowboys signed veteran linebacker
Ernie Sims, who played 13 games last year for Indianapolis.
Bruce Carter, the other Dallas starter at inside linebacker, will call
most of the defensive signals.
"Its something that definitely stings when you lose your middle
linebacker, but at the end of the day, theyre not going to cancel or
postpone the games because Sean Lee got hurt," defensive end
Marcus Spears said. "You dont have time to dwell on it."
The Cowboys are fourth in the NFL in total defence and made two key
stops in the fourth quarter at Carolina to help Dallas rally from a
14-13 deficit. Garrett showed faith in the defence by running on
third-and-9 to set up the go-ahead field goal with still 3:25 remaining.
Garrett made that decision after the injury to Lee, who also missed two
games his rookie season with a hamstring problem.
"This is not new," Garrett said. "This has happened a lot. And you rally
around it. Sean Lees the kind of guy that will stay engaged in our
football team, and we appreciate that about him."
Dallas also put punter Chris Jones on injured reserve and signed safety
Charlie Peprah. The Cowboys added linebacker Jerry Brown to the practice
squad a week after he was let go by Indianapolis.
.
The 2012 Canada-Russia Challenge, which see the top junior players from
each country competing in a four game series begins at 11am et/8am pt on
TSN2, and TSN Mobile TV.
.
Italy coach Cesare Prandelli says he wishes the 21-year-old forward
well, "but he needs to improve and this is a change I have to make."
Balotelli wasted several chances in the first half of Italys 1-1 draw
with Croatia on Thursday, appearing hesitant in front of goal.
. For all the incredible hitting feats of Jose Bautista,
Edwin Encarnacion and Colby Rasmus, I settled on two pitchers;
Luis Perez and Casey Janssen.
. - David Beckham does not believe he is the right person to light the
flame in the Opening Ceremony of his hometown at the London 2012 Olympic
Games.
. The eight women and four men who mostly care little about baseball
then began deliberations Tuesday that will impact one of the most
successful pitchers of his generation -- and, in a way, the criminal
pursuit of athletes accused of illegal doping.Got a question on rule
clarification, comments on rule enforcements or some memorable NHL
stories? Kerry Fraser wants to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.ca!
Kerry,
Having seen so many NHL games whilst in NHL cities (especially my
Sharks), I have always wanted to know at what point in the game do the
calls become more lenient. Im not suggesting that you or any referee
puts their whistle "in their pocket," but some "borderline" calls
clearly dont get called with 3 minutes left of an important tied game at
the same rate they do at the beginning of the game. I know every
referee never wants to be perceived as dictating the final result, so
how did you handle this situation…where you see a "minor" minor penalty
towards the end of an import game (i.e. playoff game)?
Best of luck at TSN! I still remember your call when I was younger
(much younger) getting mad at you during the 1992-93 Stanley Cup Finals
(Kings v. Canadians) when you called a penalty for too much curve in the
stick against a Kings player but have grown to have a tremendous amount
of respect for you (and you were right on that call)!
Shane HauschildLondon, U.K.
Shane:
I am thrilled to receive your question that found my CMon Ref mailbag
all the way from Jolly Old England. The answer (or absence of a
definitive one) Old Chap is bound to create some debate amongst the
readers and bloggers of this column.
At least one thing we can likely agree upon is that the NHL rules are
most often written in the sand of an hour glass (or game clock) and not
in stone; especially in the playoffs. The Referees judgment and
ultimate standard of enforcement can be affected to various degrees by
the score, time and the importance of the game. Infractions that
resulted in a penalty being called earlier a game may not be deemed a
penalty with the score close in the late stages. The extent of liberties
that players feel they can take is directly proportional to what the
referees allow through a relaxation of their standard.
I do not believe borderline or marginal infractions should be called at
any time in a game. The game temperature might require that the referee
impose himself and set a tighter standard to establish or maintain
control early in a game. As the game is played out, the control factor
might only require minor maintenance depending upon how the players
respond.
When the game is on the line, however, what was previously perceived as a
legitimate penalty call can cross into the borderline or marginal
category through a redefinition in the minds of many within the hockey
community beyond just the referee(s). The notion to let the players
decide the outcome of the game (and not the referee) is steeped in a
history somewhat unique to the game of hockey.
I have always felt that common sense and logic must be utilized in
applying the rules to allow for an entertaining flow of the game.
However, by not calling an obvious penalty infraction (if observed), I
also believed the referee could ultimately play a part in determining
the outcome of the game. If the referee(s) fails to do his job,
inconsistency is created at the very least. In extreme cases, the
referee boxes himself in as one non-call leads to another and the
inmates can end up running the prison. It then becomes almost impossible
to call a penalty beyond a delay of game for the puck being shot over
the glass. This unenviable position occurs whenever the ref puts his
"whistle in his pocket," Shane.
Fortunately we have not seen this take place in these playoffs as
frequently as we did last season. In the Kings-Coyotes game last night,
while there were some minor inconsistencies, I felt the two guys did a
prettty good job in calling what the game required. .
The players were allowed to compete hard and play on the edge. This
series will create a challenge for the referees of future games as
player animosity intensify to allow the game to be played on the edge
while maintaining an acceptable level of control.
I have always maintained that the best way to achieve an acceptable
level of control is when the players know the limit that the referee
sets throughout the game. An expectation and even fear is established in
their minds that a penalty will be called if they cross the line as
opposed to assuming that one likely wont be called. The onus should be
clearly on the players to remain disciplined within these guidelines the
referee has set. When they commit the crime they should expect to do
the time in the penalty box. It is the referees job to establish the
limits and to enforce the rules in an acceptable manner. When they do
so, the referees should not be blamed for the undisciplined or
irresponsible actions of a player. That, of course, is in a perfect
hockey world that is yet to be achieved.
Prior to Game 3 of the 1989 Stanley Cup Final between Montreal and
Calgary, I was instructed by Director of Officiating John McCauley that
he wanted me to bring the series back to an acceptable level of control
and to lay the hammer down if necessary. His directions were clear and I
called a number of penalties in the first and second periods. The
penalties tapered off as the players got the message and played hard and
on the edge, but in control. No penalties were called in the third
period or first overtime.
We had just about completed the second overtime when Montreal forward
Shane Corson was five feet from the side boards and facing them just
inside his end zone. Corson had just shot the puck up ice as I observed
Calgary forward Mark Hunter coming to finish a late check on the back of
Corson. I had sufficient time given the separation between the two
players to think almost out loud, " Veer off Hunts! Dont finish; dont
hit him!"
Shane Hauschild from London in the UK, I must tell you that I saw in
advance this hit would not be good. I did not want to have to impose
myself and call a penalty at this stage of the game in the second
overtime. Mark Hunter made solid contact to the back of Shane Corson
and drove the Canadiens player head first into the boards. I immediately
raised my arm and assessed a boarding penalty.
The Flames killed the penalty (barely) as the Canadiens were buzzing all
around goalie Mike Vernon. Mark Hunter had just exited the penalty box
and entered into his defensive zone but had not yet joined the play
when Montreal scored the game-winning goal. Many questioned how I could
call a penalty "at that time in the game." John McCauley answered the
press by stating that he would have been upset if Fraser or any of his
referees had not called a penalty on that obvious infraction.
Shane, the answer to your specific question is that there isnt a referee
who wants to be perceived as dictating the final result of a game by
calling a penalty. When a players actions cross the line and he commits
an infraction the referee must do his job first by calling a penalty
and accept the fallout that might result later.
My hope is that the refs whistle remains on his finger and not in his
pocket and he will be given credit for doing his job in situations that
call for the assessment of a penalty at any time in the game.
For a personally autographed copy of Final Call from TSN hockey analyst
and former NHL referee Kerry Fraser, visit The Book Keeper website.
For a regular copy of Final Call from TSN hockey analyst and former NHL
referee Kerry Fraser, visit here.
'
'
'
阅读(269) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |