半个PostgreSQL DBA,热衷于数据库相关的技术。我的ppt分享https://pan.baidu.com/s/1eRQsdAa https://github.com/chenhuajun https://chenhuajun.github.io
分类: LINUX
2017-01-21 23:30:56
core dump就是在进程crash时把包括内存在内的现场保留下来,以备故障分析。 但有时候,进程crash了却没有输出core,因为有一些因素会影响输出还是不输出core文件。 常见的一个coredump开关是ulimit -c,它限制允许输出的coredump文件的最大size,如果要输出的core文件大小超过这个值将不输出core文件。
ulimit -c的输出为0,代表关闭core dump输出。
[root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# ulimit -c 0
设置ulimit -c unlimited,将不对core文件大小做限制
[root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# ulimit -c unlimited [root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# ulimit -c unlimited
这样设置的ulimit值只在当前会话中有效,重开一个终端起进程是不受影响的。
ulimit -c只是众多影响core输出因素中的一个,其它因素可以参考man。
$ man core ... There are various circumstances in which a core dump file is not produced: * The process does not have permission to write the core file. (By default the core file is called core, and is created in the current working directory. See below for details on naming.) Writing the core file will fail if the directory in which it is to be created is non-writable, or if a file with the same name exists and is not writable or is not a regular file (e.g., it is a directory or a symbolic link). * A (writable, regular) file with the same name as would be used for the core dump already exists, but there is more than one hard link to that file. * The file system where the core dump file would be created is full; or has run out of inodes; or is mounted read-only; or the user has reached their quota for the file system. * The directory in which the core dump file is to be created does not exist. * The RLIMIT_CORE (core file size) or RLIMIT_FSIZE (file size) resource limits for the process are set to zero; see getrlimit(2) and the documentation of the shell’s ulimit command (limit in csh(1)). * The binary being executed by the process does not have read permission enabled. * The process is executing a set-user-ID (set-group-ID) program that is owned by a user (group) other than the real user (group) ID of the process. (However, see the description of the prctl(2) PR_SET_DUMPABLE operation, and the description of the /proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable file in proc(5).)
其实还漏了一个,进程可以捕获那些本来会出core的信号,然后自己来处理,比如MySQL就是这么干的。
RHEL/CentOS下默认开启abrtd进行故障现场记录(包括生成coredump)和故障报告
此时abrtd进程是启动的,
[root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# service abrtd status abrtd (pid 8711) is running...
core文件的生成位置被重定向到了abrt-hook-ccpp
[root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern |/usr/libexec/abrt-hook-ccpp %s %c %p %u %g %t e
生成以下产生coredump的程序,并执行。
testcoredump.c:
int main() { return 1/0; }
编译并执行
$gcc testcoredump.c -o testcoredump $./testcoredump
查看系统日志,中途临时产生了core文件,但最后又被删掉了。
$tail -f /var/log/messages ... Dec 8 09:54:44 srdsdevapp69 kernel: testcoredump[4028] trap divide error ip:400489 sp:7fff5a54b200 error:0 in testcoredump[400000+1000] Dec 8 09:54:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2016-12-08-09:54:44-4028' creation detected Dec 8 09:54:44 srdsdevapp69 abrt[4029]: Saved core dump of pid 4028 (/root/testcoredump) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-09:54:44-4028 (184320 bytes) Dec 8 09:54:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Executable '/root/testcoredump' doesn't belong to any package Dec 8 09:54:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: 'post-create' on '/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-09:54:44-4028' exited with 1 Dec 8 09:54:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Corrupted or bad directory /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-09:54:44-4028, deleting
abrtd默认只保留软件包里的程序产生的core文件,修改下面的参数可以让其记录所有程序的core文件。
$vi /etc/abrt/abrt-action-save-package-data.conf ... ProcessUnpackaged = yes
再执行一次测试程序就好生成core文件了
Dec 8 10:04:30 srdsdevapp69 kernel: testcoredump[9189] trap divide error ip:400489 sp:7fff99973b30 error:0 in testcoredump[400000+1000] Dec 8 10:04:30 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189' creation detected Dec 8 10:04:30 srdsdevapp69 abrt[9190]: Saved core dump of pid 9189 (/root/testcoredump) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189 (184320 bytes) Dec 8 10:04:31 srdsdevapp69 kernel: Bridge firewalling registered Dec 8 10:04:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Sending an email... Dec 8 10:04:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Email was sent to: root@localhost Dec 8 10:04:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: New problem directory /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189, processing Dec 8 10:04:44 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: No actions are found for event 'notify'
abrtd可以识别出是重复问题,并能够去重,这可以防止core文件生成的过多把磁盘用光。
Dec 8 10:18:35 srdsdevapp69 kernel: testcoredump[16598] trap divide error ip:400489 sp:7fff26cc9f50 error:0 in testcoredump[400000+1000] Dec 8 10:18:35 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2016-12-08-10:18:35-16598' creation detected Dec 8 10:18:35 srdsdevapp69 abrt[16599]: Saved core dump of pid 16598 (/root/testcoredump) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-10:18:35-16598 (184320 bytes) Dec 8 10:18:45 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Sending an email... Dec 8 10:18:45 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Email was sent to: root@localhost Dec 8 10:18:45 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Duplicate: UUID Dec 8 10:18:45 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: DUP_OF_DIR: /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189 Dec 8 10:18:45 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Problem directory is a duplicate of /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189 Dec 8 10:18:45 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Deleting problem directory ccpp-2016-12-08-10:18:35-16598 (dup of ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189) Dec 8 10:18:45 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: No actions are found for event 'notify_dup'
abrtd对crash报告的大小(主要是core文件)有限制(参数MaxCrashReportsSize设置),超过了也不会生成core文件,相应的日志如下。
Dec 8 14:10:32 srdsdevapp69 abrt[10548]: Saved core dump of pid 10527 (/usr/local/Percona-Server-5.6.29-rel76.2-Linux.x86_64.ssl101/bin/mysqld) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-14:10:00-10527 (10513362944 bytes) Dec 8 14:10:32 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2016-12-08-14:10:00-10527' creation detected Dec 8 14:10:32 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Size of '/var/spool/abrt' >= 1000 MB, deleting 'ccpp-2016-12-08-14:05:43-8080' Dec 8 14:10:32 srdsdevapp69 abrt[10548]: /var/spool/abrt is 25854515653 bytes (more than 1279MiB), deleting 'ccpp-2016-12-08-14:05:43-8080' Dec 8 14:10:32 srdsdevapp69 abrt[10548]: Lock file '/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-14:05:43-8080/.lock' is locked by process 7893 Dec 8 14:10:32 srdsdevapp69 abrt[10548]: '/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-14:05:43-8080' does not exist Dec 8 14:10:41 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Sending an email... Dec 8 14:10:41 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Email was sent to: root@localhost Dec 8 14:10:41 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: New problem directory /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-14:10:00-10527, processing Dec 8 14:10:41 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: No actions are found for event 'notify'
abrtd是监控/var/spool/abrt/目录触发的,做个copy操作也会触发abrtd。
[root@srdsdevapp69 abrt]# cp -rf ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189 ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-91891
下面是产生的系统日志:
Dec 8 10:35:33 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-91891' creation detected Dec 8 10:35:33 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Duplicate: UUID Dec 8 10:35:33 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: DUP_OF_DIR: /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189 Dec 8 10:35:33 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Problem directory is a duplicate of /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189 Dec 8 10:35:33 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: Deleting problem directory ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-91891 (dup of ccpp-2016-12-08-10:04:30-9189) Dec 8 10:35:33 srdsdevapp69 abrtd: No actions are found for event 'notify_dup'
如果修改core生成目录,不使用abrt-hook-ccpp回调程序等于禁用了abrtd
echo "/data/core-%e-%p-%t">/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
再发生coredump时/var/log/messages中没有abrtd相关的记录
Dec 8 10:30:24 srdsdevapp69 kernel: testcoredump[23050] trap divide error ip:400489 sp:7fff9f01dfb0 error:0 in testcoredump[400000+1000]
此时core文件会被直接生成到/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern指定的位置
/data/core-testcoredump-23050-1481164224
由于/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern中未使用abrt-hook-ccpp回调程序,检查abrt-ccpp服务状态也会相应的返回服务未启动。
[root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# service abrt-ccpp status [root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# echo $? 3
恢复/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern之后,abrt-ccpp服务变回正常
[root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# echo "|/usr/libexec/abrt-hook-ccpp %s %c %p %u %g %t e">/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern [root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# service abrt-ccpp status [root@srdsdevapp69 ~]# echo $? 0
如果停止abrtd
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern为"|/usr/libexec/abrt-hook-ccpp %s %c %p %u %g %t e"
会在生成当前目录生成core文件
Dec 8 10:46:21 srdsdevapp69 kernel: testcoredump[31364] trap divide error ip:400489 sp:7fff15d6f450 error:0 in testcoredump[400000+1000] Dec 8 10:46:21 srdsdevapp69 abrt[31365]: abrtd is not running. If it crashed, /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern contains a stale value, consider resetting it to 'core' Dec 8 10:46:21 srdsdevapp69 abrt[31365]: Saved core dump of pid 31364 to /root/core.31364 (184320 bytes)
MySQL的服务进程mysqld会自己捕获可能引起crash的信号,默认会输出调用栈后异常退出不会生成core文件。
2016-12-08 11:14:51 14034 [Note] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld: ready for connections. Version: '5.6.29-76.2-debug-log' socket: '/mysqlrds/data/mysql.sock' port: 3306 Source distribution 03:18:43 UTC - mysqld got signal 8 ; This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that this binary or one of the libraries it was linked against is corrupt, improperly built, or misconfigured. This error can also be caused by malfunctioning hardware. We will try our best to scrape up some info that will hopefully help diagnose the problem, but since we have already crashed, something is definitely wrong and this may fail. Please help us make Percona Server better by reporting any bugs at key_buffer_size=33554432 read_buffer_size=2097152 max_used_connections=2 max_threads=100001 thread_count=1 connection_count=1 It is possible that mysqld could use up to key_buffer_size + (read_buffer_size + sort_buffer_size)*max_threads = 307242932 K bytes of memory Hope that's ok; if not, decrease some variables in the equation. Thread pointer: 0x2427ca20 Attempting backtrace. You can use the following information to find out where mysqld died. If you see no messages after this, something went terribly wrong... stack_bottom = 7fd53066bca8 thread_stack 0x40000 /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(my_print_stacktrace+0x35)[0xaf23c9] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(handle_fatal_signal+0x42e)[0x74d42a] /lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x3805a0f7e0] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(_Z19mysql_rename_tablesP3THDP10TABLE_LISTb+0x6c)[0x82fa64] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(_Z21mysql_execute_commandP3THD+0x2aab)[0x8079e9] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(_Z11mysql_parseP3THDPcjP12Parser_state+0x588)[0x810ce3] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(_Z16dispatch_command19enum_server_commandP3THDPcj+0xd8b)[0x80228a] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(_Z10do_commandP3THD+0x3bd)[0x801087] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(_Z26threadpool_process_requestP3THD+0x71)[0x8ec721] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld[0x8ef363] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld[0x8ef5a0] /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld(pfs_spawn_thread+0x159)[0xe14049] /lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x3805a07aa1] /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x32286e893d] Trying to get some variables. Some pointers may be invalid and cause the dump to abort. Query (7fd508004d80): is an invalid pointer Connection ID (thread ID): 1 Status: NOT_KILLED You may download the Percona Server operations manual by visiting You may find information in the manual which will help you identify the cause of the crash.
要使其产生core文件必须打开--core-file开关
mysqld --defaults-file=/home/mysql/etc/my.cnf --core-file &
也可以将这个参数加入到my.cnf文件中
core_file
关于core文件的大小有个奇怪的现象,其实际占用的磁盘空间可能远小于文件大小。
比如下面的core文件,文件大小10GB,但实际占用磁盘只有2GB(1940984 * 512B)。
[root@srdsdevapp69 ccpp-2016-12-08-14:10:00-10527]# stat coredump File: `coredump' Size: 10513362944 Blocks: 1940984 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: fd03h/64771d Inode: 14990 Links: 1 Access: (0640/-rw-r-----) Uid: ( 173/ abrt) Gid: ( 512/ mysql) Access: 2016-12-08 14:10:41.886280668 +0800 Modify: 2016-12-08 14:10:27.704523443 +0800 Change: 2016-12-08 14:10:27.704523443 +0800
这是由于系统在生成core文件时,skip了部分全零的块,即文件中有hole(用dd的seek可以模拟这个现象)。不管是在/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern中设置abrt-hook-ccpp程序还是直接设置文件目录,都是这个现象。这其实是一个不错的优化,节省了磁盘空间也加快了core文件生成速度。